Richard Hosey – Developing Companies, People, as Well as Projects

Kim Kisner
April 30, 2024
Business

The career of Richard Hosey, owner of Hosey Development LLC, has spanned development, consulting, financing, and asset management of more than 75 projects in Detroit totaling over $2.5 billion in development costs.

His most recent undertaking is the renovation of the former Fisher Body 21 plant, a $134 million project that will preserve and redevelop the plant into approximately 435 rental apartments; 38,000 square feet of commercial space; outdoor and indoor amenities; and up to 139 interior and 646 adjacent surface parking spaces. At least 20% of rental units will be affordable for those earning no more than 80% of the area median income ($51,200 or less for a two-person household).

SBN Detroit spoke to Hosey about his work and his impact on sustainability in Detroit.

Q: Tell us about Hosey Development.

A: I’ve been in real estate since 1996, and then I worked for Bank of America from 2005 to 2013 investing in urban development. That job brought me back to Detroit in 2008. I remember arguing with a city councilperson on why the Lafayette Building should not be torn down, and that it should be invested in and rehabbed. She said to me, ‘Would you do it?’ and I thought, yes, I need to stop complaining and start doing something. I started with the Kirby Center Lofts, which was an old Hebrew School in Midtown, and then it became a process after that.

Q: Talk about preserving affordable housing in Detroit and how you work to do this.

A: In 2008, the city was only building affordable housing, which created concentrated poverty.

On the other hand, as the market rate takes off, we need to ensure that it’s reasonably and rationally balanced so housing doesn’t become unaffordable. Revitalization tends to push out affordability, but the City of Detroit has an affordability requirement inside every project to ensure this doesn’t happen.

I love the work of the Detroit Land Bank. Affordable housing should not just be apartment living. With programs like Rehab and Ready, they are going into neighborhoods and driving change.

Q: You provide financing for your subcontractors. Can you tell us about that?

A: I focus on employing Detroiters. Detroit has plenty of construction talent, but there are not plenty of contractors with the capacity to carry a big job. There is an upfront economic load that comes with larger jobs, such as purchasing materials and paying for labor that many – most – construction companies in Detroit can’t shoulder.

For my first project – the Kirby Center – I started thinking what if I carry the job? I then met Mel Washington, a local developer who walked me through the process of doing so.

Now, my partner and I are using this same concept on the Fisher 21 project. We are using companies that have the skills and the organization to do a big job like this but can’t buy $1 million in HVAC equipment upfront and get paid later. So we do that part.

Fisher Exterior1 — FISHER 21 PROJECT EXTERIOR

It’s been great working this way. We get Detroit companies who do great work.

Q: How do you think sustainability plays into what you do?

A: As we build up the ecosystem such that our contractors in Detroit are getting the jobs, the economics go in a circle. Good-paying jobs mean the workers buy homes here, buy cars here, and spend their money here. That’s the ideal model.

For a lot of years, construction companies would come into the city, make their money, and go back to their homes in Oakland County or Macomb County. The key is to keep it in Detroit so the dollars stay in the community and circulate.

From an environmental standpoint, rehabbing a building versus tearing it down is much better for our planet. The challenge comes with being good to the tenant while being good to the planet. For example, we can put in huge beautiful windows, but how high is the electric bill going to be? We then need to find solutions for the most efficient furnace so the tenant isn’t impacted by a huge expense.

Q: The redevelopment of the Fisher plant is the largest Black-led development in the city. What is the importance of this?

A: I want this to become the everyday normal. So many processes focus on the idea that there is no talent or capacity in Detroit.

I hope to be able to show that larger projects can be handled by Black and Brown teams. We still have a long way to go. The Fisher project at $135 million is just 3% of the $5 billion in development announced in the last twelve months. But I hope to build a model for black funders and black talent to come together.

Q: What is the future of Hosey Development?

A: I will be in this market for the long run. I picture myself exclusively in Detroit except for one thing – mentoring new and existing developers. Again, I will feel more successful when more Black and Brown people and women are involved in development in the city.

And it’s happening. Many small and midlevel Black and Brown developers are coming into Detroit in ways you don’t see in other cities. Diverse developers are landing here because they can get a foothold. Preserving that should be a priority.

Removing barriers and growing talent based on ability as opposed to inherited wealth is one of the most important things we can provide in this market.

Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.

Kim Kisner

With over 25 years of experience in the development and execution of strategic branding, content planning, and copywriting for brands such as Gatorade, Ford Motor Company, and Under Armour, and published by SEEN Magazine, The Jewish News, and countless health and lifestyle journals and blogs, Kim helps companies, brands, and people tell their stories.

More From SBN Detroit

Building with Purpose

August 5, 2025 No Comments

MassTimber@MSU is a cross-disciplinary initiative at Michigan State University dedicated to advancing mass timber construction and manufacturing in Michigan. Collaborating with partners across construction, forestry, development, and state agencies—including the Michigan Department of Natural Resources—the initiative leverages MSU’s land-grant mission through research, teaching, stakeholder engagement, and policy development to build a sustainable mass timber future for the state. SBN Detroit interviewed Sandra Lupien, Director of MassTimber@MSU, about the environmental, economic, and design implications of mass timber and the growing momentum behind the material in Michigan and beyond. Q: What is the MassTimber@MSU initiative, and what inspired its creation? A: MassTimber@MSU is a collaboration across MSU’s School of Planning, Design and Construction, Department of Forestry, and MSU Extension. We work with partners across the state—including construction professionals, foresters, community and development organizations, and state agencies like the Michigan Department of Natural Resources—to advance mass timber construction and manufacturing in Michigan. Our approach reflects MSU’s land-grant mission: research, teaching and curriculum development, stakeholder engagement, and policy exploration that could support mass timber adoption. Since I started in this role in July 2021, momentum is growing. There are now more than 65 mass timber projects in the pipeline in Michigan. The STEM Teaching and Learning Facility on MSU’s campus, which is the second building in the state to use cross-laminated timber (CLT), helped demonstrate what’s possible. And we’re now seeing serious interest from prospective producers who are looking to locate in Michigan. Q: What are the environmental benefits of mass timber in terms of sustainability, carbon reduction, and climate resilience? A: This is exactly what drew me to mass timber. It’s a tool in our toolkit to reduce carbon emissions, support sustainable communities, and help foster healthier, more resilient forests. Globally, the built environment accounts for about 39% of greenhouse gas emissions—28% from building operations and 11% from construction materials like concrete, steel, and glass. These materials are essential, but they’re energy-intensive to produce. Wood, by contrast, is a renewable resource that stores carbon. When we use wood in construction, we’re not only lowering a building’s embodied carbon footprint—we’re also locking that carbon into the structure itself. At MSU, the STEM Teaching and Learning Facility contains roughly 3,000 cubic meters of mass timber, which stores about 1,856 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. That’s comparable to removing the emissions from 4 million miles driven by an average car. Mass timber buildings, in this way, become carbon storage banks. On the forestry side, we know that many forests evolved with low-intensity natural fires that helped maintain healthy densities. Today, many of our forests are overcrowded, which makes them vulnerable to pests, disease, and catastrophic wildfire. Because of past logging practices and fire suppression, we have an obligation—and opportunity—to steward forests more sustainably. When we do that, we can produce wood that extends the climate benefits of trees, especially if that wood would otherwise decay or burn. Q: How are MSU students and faculty engaging with mass timber—from design to research to real-world application? A: There are three main academic areas deeply engaged with mass timber: Construction Management, Forestry and Biochemistry, and Civil and Environmental Engineering. We have undergraduates, master’s students, and Ph.D. candidates working with faculty on projects across those disciplines. In Construction Management, Professor George Berghorn is developing mass timber curriculum modules that can be used nationally in engineering and construction programs. In Forestry, Professor Mojgan Nejad is doing incredible work on developing bio-based adhesives and coatings for use in mass timber—replacing fossil-fuel-based polyurethane with lignin-based alternatives. She’s actively working toward commercialization. We’ve also done economic research to analyze supply chains and survey demand, which helps inform developers and policymakers. And beginning Spring 2025, we launched a new course focused entirely on mass timber, led by Dr. George Berghorn and tailored for both undergraduate and graduate students. Q: From an economic perspective, how could mass timber help revitalize Michigan’s forestry sector and rural economies? A: We’ve modeled the economic impacts of launching a 50,000-cubic-meter-per-year mass timber manufacturing facility in Michigan. The results are exciting: such a facility would contribute $152 million to the state’s GDP and support 318 jobs. There’s a strong need to find new uses for Michigan wood. With the paper industry in decline and other traditional markets shifting, mass timber presents an opportunity to create high-value products that support Michigan jobs and rural economies. Q: How does the initiative align with Michigan’s climate goals or sustainable development strategies statewide? A: The MI Healthy Climate Plan, which outlines the state’s climate goals, directly mentions mass timber three times—as a key strategy for reducing emissions in the built environment and managing natural lands sustainably. The City of Lansing’s Sustainability Action Plan also highlights mass timber, and East Lansing has even amended its zoning ordinance to incentivize developers to use mass timber and build LEED-certified projects. It’s encouraging to see this kind of policy support—it sends a signal that mass timber can and should be part of Michigan’s climate solution. Q: What does Michigan’s existing forest resource look like, and how does sustainable forestry tie into your vision? A: Healthy, resilient forests are the foundation of everything we do. In Michigan, about 70% of our forest resource is hardwood and 30% is softwood. Most mass timber products currently certified for use in the U.S. are made from softwoods. That said, Michigan does have suitable softwood species. For example, red pine was certified for structural use because the Michigan DNR prioritized using Michigan wood in a customer service building in the Upper Peninsula. That’s a great example of state leadership driving local wood utilization. As the industry evolves, there’s potential to expand the species we can use in mass timber production. Q: Looking ahead five to ten years, what’s your boldest vision for the impact of the Mass Timber Initiative? A: I’d like to see commercial buildings—everything from multifamily housing to community centers to industrial facilities—considering mass timber from the outset, not as a novelty but as a viable, mainstream option. Mass timber

Aligning Business with Sustainability

July 29, 2025 No Comments

Comerica Inc. was founded in Detroit in 1849 and remains rooted in Southeast Michigan, even as its headquarters now sit in Dallas. With 4,300 employees in the region and a strong presence across the state, the bank continues to play an active role in environmental responsibility and community impact. SBN Detroit interviewed Scott Beckerman, Senior Vice President and Director of Corporate Sustainability, about the bank’s climate strategy, operational footprint, and the role financial institutions play in driving sustainable progress. Q: Comerica has deep roots in Detroit, even as its headquarters are now in Dallas. How does that legacy influence the bank’s sustainability priorities in Southeast Michigan and beyond? A: Comerica is really proud of our 175-year legacy in Detroit, and over half of our employees are here. As a lifelong resident of the Detroit area myself, I recognize the unique environment of this region. So naturally, there is a certain connection to our desire to protect and preserve this special environment. But we also know that environmental issues aren’t just local – they are global in their nature. I think the connection here is that we understand the importance of issues in the near-term and at the local scale but also recognize the importance of the global scale. For issues like climate change, that means our future success depends on the actions we are taking today, both here in the Detroit area and across the country. Q: What are the most pressing environmental or climate-related risks Comerica is working to address within its operations and client services? A: Our commitment is around three main areas: Reducing our own environmental footprint, embedding sustainability into our business, and supporting our customers’ needs. For our own footprint, we are focused on reducing water consumption, waste generation, resource consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. Since 2012, we’ve reduced our GHG emissions 61%, – on our way to a 65% reduction target by 2030 and moving toward our north star of 100% reduction by 2050. For water, we’ve decreased our consumption by 48% and have also seen a 41% reduction in waste. On the resource consumption side, our focus is paper usage and since 2012 we’ve decreased that by 89%. For our customers, we want to ensure they have access to the financial products and services they need to address the challenges they face. Maybe for a homeowner, that is a home equity loan to make their home more energy efficient or add solar to their roof. For a business, that may mean providing the financing to upgrade the efficiency of their equipment or capital improvements to a building to make it more climate resilient. Q: Comerica has made commitments to reduce operational emissions and increase energy efficiency. Can you walk us through the key strategies being used to reach those goals — and how success is measured? A: Our primary drive has been a focus on energy efficiency. With roughly 400 buildings in our portfolio, this is no easy task, and no two buildings are alike. We’ve deployed a host of efficiency measures from lighting to advanced building controls to really working on driving down energy consumption, which is the largest contributor to our greenhouse gas emissions. The other important thing is to right-size our real estate footprint while still serving our customer needs. A lot has changed with the digitalization of banking, and we simply don’t need the same amount of space that we needed in the past. So being smart about the amount of real estate we occupy has also helped us drive down our overall energy consumption. At the same time, we recognize that the shift to a digital world is not without its own set of issues, including GHG emissions, so we work with providers to ensure the majority of our technology and data center needs are powered by renewable energy. We’re also investing in renewable energy solutions across our footprint, focused on local impacts, including piloting solar projects and REC (renewable energy certificate)-backed electricity programs in Michigan and Texas. Q: What role does Comerica’s sustainability team play in engaging business units across such a large organization? How do you ensure consistency in implementation? A: First, we center our sustainability program on value creation. What I mean by that is that our sustainability initiatives need to be generating value by reducing risks or costs, spurring innovation, and supporting revenue growth. If we do all that well, it enhances our reputation and brand which delivers additional value. While it may be cliché, I think it’s true that sustainability really is the ultimate team sport. We are successful with our programs because we have the buy-in and support from colleagues across our organization. We also support sustainability through colleague education, regional Green Teams, and volunteer-driven community programs. Q: In your view, what’s the biggest challenge for banks — especially legacy institutions like Comerica — when it comes to embedding sustainability into the core business model? A: For any business, there are a ton of ever-evolving business priorities, based on things like the market, customer needs, regulatory requirements, and changing technology. So, if you approach sustainability as an add-on to the traditional business priorities, then it can get pushed aside by pressing traditional business needs of the moment. But if you embed sustainability into your core values and it becomes a part of how you do business, then it becomes a long-term source of business stability. At Comerica, we have a core value of being “A Force For Good,” which means we’ve worked to embed sustainability into how we do business. Since the establishment of our sustainability office in 2008, that means we’ve significantly reduced our environmental footprint and delivered tens of millions of dollars of cost savings. Q: Where do you see the greatest opportunity for Comerica to lead — whether through lending practices, investments, community partnerships, or internal operations? A: Our length of time in this space has given us a real advantage in terms of long-term impacts. During that time,

Identifying Opportunities for Improved Efficiencies

July 22, 2025 No Comments

The Energy Alliance Group of North America focuses on helping businesses implement sustainable energy solutions by identifying opportunities for improved efficiency and connecting clients to funding and technology. Based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the company collaborates with commercial and industrial property managers to reduce energy consumption, enhance operations, and achieve long-term cost savings. SBN Detroit interviewed Scott Ringlein, founder, principal, and Chief Strategy Officer, about energy efficiency in Southeast Michigan, the role of financing and audits, and the importance of long-term thinking when it comes to sustainability. Q: What are the biggest energy efficiency challenges facing commercial and industrial buildings in Southeast Michigan? A: Misinformation is one of the biggest challenges. Every building has the opportunity to implement energy efficiency improvements, and there is money available to make it happen. These improvements offer a return on investment, but many building operators and owners either don’t believe the numbers or assume they don’t apply to them. The truth is, utility costs are ongoing and only getting higher, so the only way to gain control is to improve your building’s efficiency. Q: How can businesses identify when it’s time to upgrade or retrofit their energy systems A: Start by knowing what you have—what systems are in place, their expected lifespan, and their maintenance history. If you’re seeing frequent repairs and higher maintenance costs, it’s time to look at alternatives. Then evaluate how much more efficient a new system could be and what kind of energy savings it could deliver. If the numbers make sense, that’s the signal to move forward. Unfortunately, many businesses struggle with that last step—deciding to invest. Q: What misconceptions do you commonly encounter around cost recovery or energy savings? A: Many building owners don’t believe the projections—even when we show them data that supports a positive cash flow within one or two years. They tend to focus solely on ROI and forget that utilities never go away. You’re always going to pay for water, electricity, gas—whatever it is. And the utility companies have no vested interest in lowering your costs. So even if you’re skeptical, you’re still going to be paying more year after year unless you act. Q: How has the financing landscape changed for energy upgrades—especially for nonprofits or small businesses? A: We’ve been in this space since 2012, and the financing options today are better than they’ve ever been. Tax credits will come and go, but there are more long-term tools now than there were a decade ago. Michigan has been a leader in this area. Programs like Michigan Saves were the first of their kind in the U.S. We’re also a state approved for Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing, although it’s underutilized here compared to states like California. Still, the options are out there—you have choices, and you can take control. Q: What role do energy audits play in long-term planning, and how often should they be conducted? A: Audits are essential. You need to know where you stand—what equipment you have, how efficient it is, and what condition it’s in. It’s surprising how many clients have never even been on their own roof, where all the major equipment is housed. There are different levels of audits. A Level 1 audit gives you a basic understanding of what you have and where you’re spending your money. A Level 3 audit goes deeper and is useful when you’re preparing to make major decisions—like process changes or equipment replacement. A challenge is that many companies don’t take the time for a comprehensive audit until it’s too late. Smaller organizations may lack the staff, and larger ones may lose visibility due to scale. But without that baseline, long-term planning is difficult. Q: How do Southeast Michigan’s climate swings shape energy strategy in the region? A: As an organization, we don’t use climate change as the primary argument for doing the right thing. Climate change is happening, but we believe the conversation around energy efficiency should be happening regardless. You’re spending money on utilities – and there are better systems and more efficient ways to operate. We also need to think long-term. In the U.S., we don’t treat these upgrades as long-term investments the way they do in Europe or Asia. There, the systems are central to the building’s value and are maintained accordingly. Here, we often focus too much on short-term costs instead of building for performance and sustainability. Q: What advice do you have for businesses looking to reduce costs and improve operations going forward? A: Real-time monitoring of building systems from a central location gives you visibility and control. Beyond that, the cost of implementing technologies like LED lighting, heat pumps, solar panels, and combined heat and power (CHP) systems has become very feasible. There are also integrated systems now—solar light poles with battery storage and surveillance, for example—that operate independently of utility companies. The key is maintenance. These systems don’t last forever if they’re neglected. But with built-in monitoring and upkeep, they can be powerful tools for cutting costs and improving resilience. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.

Designing for Longevity

July 15, 2025 No Comments

Floyd, founded in Detroit in 2013, is a furniture company focused on creating modular, long-lasting pieces designed to reduce waste and rethink traditional home furnishings. Known for its clean, adaptable designs and commitment to sustainability, Floyd has grown from a single product to a full line of beds, sofas, tables, and storage solutions—all centered around durability and ease of assembly. SBN Detroit interviewed co-founder Kyle Hoff about how Floyd approaches sustainable design, the role of modularity in extending product life, and what the furniture industry can learn from systems thinking. Q: Sustainability is increasingly central to how products are designed. What does a “buy once, use forever” philosophy mean in practical terms when it comes to furniture? A: We always start with the idea that the best thing you can do is not buy something at all. But when you do need to make a purchase, it should be something that lasts—and adapts. That concept informs every decision: from materials to how a product is serviced and how it fits into someone’s life now and in the future. It’s not just about quality materials, but also adaptability. Can a product work in an apartment today and a family home down the road? That’s where design has to carry more responsibility. Q: Many pieces today are built for short-term use. What does “built to last” look like in design and production? A: It begins at the concept stage. Our product team works in-house in Corktown and starts by asking, “What problem does this solve?” For example, our bed frame was designed nine years ago to be a long-term, flexible solution—and it’s still an evergreen product. We’ve continued to expand on that initial product with compatible add-ons: a headboard, underbed storage, a bedside table, and a taller version. These aren’t trend-driven changes; they’re part of a system that evolves with people’s needs. Q: How should sustainability be considered in material sourcing—beyond just using recycled inputs? A: It’s a layered process. While recycled materials are great, they still have to last. A short lifespan defeats the purpose. The first priority is creating products people want to keep. That starts with durable, high-quality materials—like natural woods or wool, which we’ve leaned into recently. We also think about serviceability. If something breaks, can a part be replaced instead of the whole product? That changes how you source and design from the beginning. Q: Durability often comes with trade-offs in cost or complexity. What are the challenges in balancing sustainability with accessibility? A: Durability doesn’t have to mean expensive. It’s really about thoughtful design. A lot of mass-produced furniture is made quickly, designed for trend cycles, and lasts maybe a year or two. We try to offer long-term value—something people will keep—not luxury pricing. It’s a similar mindset to brands like Patagonia: not the cheapest, but a high return on use over time. We focus on lasting connections and construction that can stand up to real life. Q: Modularity is a growing design focus. How does that relate to sustainability and evolving lifestyles? A: It’s critical. If someone moves or their life changes, modularity lets them keep a product and adapt it. That reduces waste. A twin bed that can become a king, or a sofa with replaceable upholstery—that flexibility allows furniture to evolve with people, rather than going into a landfill. We think a lot about systems: not just selling one thing but offering pieces that can grow or change over time. Q: How do you measure the environmental footprint of your products—and improve it? A: We survey how long people use our products and how their use changes. That lifecycle data is an internal benchmark for us.We also evaluate serviceability—whether a product can be fixed instead of replaced. It’s about holding ourselves to a different standard: not just how a product is made, but how long it’s truly used. Q: Are there new materials or partnerships that stand out in your sustainability work? A: Yes—there’s a fabric company in Denmark called Kvadrat we’re working with that’s doing really thoughtful work around long-lasting, sustainable textiles. They’ve created a surface material called “really,” which is made from post-consumer garment waste. That’s an exciting example of circular design—giving textile waste a second life in new forms. Q: What changes would you like to see across the industry in terms of sustainability? A: There’s a big opportunity to focus on lifespan. Most companies aren’t incentivized to do that—they want to sell more furniture. But designing for longevity, building modularity into the system, and standing behind products long-term can shift that mindset Sustainability shouldn’t just be about natural materials or recycled content. In our view, the biggest impact is in keeping products out of landfills. That comes from design choices made long before a product reaches a home. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.

Driving Sustainable Innovation in Mobility

July 8, 2025 No Comments

ZF Group, a global technology company with its North American headquarters in Northville, specializes in systems for passenger cars, commercial vehicles, and industrial technology. With a focus on next-generation mobility, the company develops solutions that address electrification, automation, and digitalization while aiming to improve safety, efficiency, and sustainability in transportation. SBN Detroit interviewed Anuj Shah, Sustainability Lead, for the Americas, to explore the most pressing environmental challenges in the region’s mobility and manufacturing sectors – and how technology, collaboration, and design innovation are shaping a more sustainable future. Q: What are the most pressing sustainability challenges facing the mobility and manufacturing industries in Southeast Michigan today? A: One of the biggest challenges is decarbonizing our complex supply chains. To give you an idea of scale, ZF in North America alone has about 3,700 direct suppliers, and as you move further upstream, that number multiplies. Many Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers lack the tools and resources to track, manage, and reduce emissions. ZF is driving progress in this area through our supply chain sustainability program and to support our supply base, we have established a supplier sustainability training academy that offers trainings around several topics like responsible sourcing, use of green electricity and how to meet requirements set forth in our sustainability bid conditions. It is a fundamental change in philosophy in how we interact with our suppliers in the development of products and processes, and in the choices we make. Another challenge is sourcing sustainable materials. As demand for magnets and critical raw materials rises, our commitment to responsible sourcing – guided by human rights and environmental due diligence policies – becomes even more critical. Ideally, we start with using less, then designing products that can accept higher recycled content materials, and where technically feasible, designing with circularity in mind to provide access to these materials to bring them back into the loop. Q: As the auto industry shifts toward electric and digital systems, where do you see the biggest opportunities for companies in Michigan to lead in sustainable innovation? A: I see two major areas of opportunity. First, digital twins and predictive sustainability. With advances in AI, IoT and cloud computing, we continue to gain the ability to simulate and optimize sustainability across a product’s entire lifecycle. Michigan companies have the potential to drive breakthroughs here, unlocking real-time emissions tracking, predictive maintenance, and more circular design outcomes. At ZF, for example, our SCALAR platform provides real-time diagnostics to fleet operators. It’s a fleet management solution that offers remote diagnostics on vehicle health using smart sensors, telematics, and predictive maintenance that combines historical and live data to forecast potential failures and propose proactive maintenance. Second, there’s room for innovation in product design that balances cost, supply chain resilience, and sustainability, like reducing reliance on rare earth magnets. For example, ZF’s Separately Excited Synchronous Motor (SESM), a magnet-free e-motor technology. Q: How important is collaboration across suppliers, OEMs, government, and academia in accelerating sustainable progress? A: Collaboration is essential. The scale and complexity of sustainability challenges demand system-level thinking and collective action. Collaboration can take many forms, and start with small steps by sharing common standards, targets, and data. This enables clarity and provides a common language when working to decarbonize the value chain and develop more circular materials. Collaboration can also help leverage scale through greater partnership between OEMs and suppliers to take advantage of installed capacities and build upon existing competencies to lower cost and increase re-usability of infrastructure. This requires strong feedback loops between industry partners, sometimes requiring flexibility in design parameters to accommodate available off-the-shelf solutions. Some examples at ZF: We engage with our suppliers around ESG Goals, best practice sharing, and sometimes co-developing decarbonization roadmaps. We also work with external organizations like MEMA and AIAG, providing inputs on policy, contribute to white papers, and align on best practices on various topics like human rights and supply chain transparency. These platforms are critical for creating a consistent approach across the industry. Q: The mobility industry is under growing pressure to quantify and reduce emissions. How is the conversation around Scope 3 evolving, and what tools are helping drive accountability? A: The conversation around Scope 3 has evolved rapidly, from awareness to tangible action. Just a few years ago, many companies were working to define and estimate these indirect emissions. Today, Scope 3 is front and center, especially in the automotive industry, where upstream and downstream emissions make up the majority of a company’s emissions. At ZF, we’re approaching Scope 3 with a focus on data integrity, supplier engagement, and cross-industry collaboration Transparency and supplier engagement are key. We are systematically working to move away from secondary emissions data and working closely with our suppliers to gather more accurate product-specific emissions data. This is critical for building trust and accountability across the value chain. Regarding our emissions, disclosure alone isn’t enough; our stakeholders expect us to present clear decarbonization roadmaps. Many of our customers have also defined product-level and material-level carbon footprint targets, which is helping shift the broader industry mindset. We’re also participating in initiatives like Catena-X, which helps standardize the sharing of ESG metrics. That kind of consistency enables more meaningful collaboration across the value chain. Ultimately, Scope 3 is where the real transformation happens — and it’s also where the greatest opportunity lies. By working together across the value chain, we can drive measurable, lasting impact. Q: You’ve spoken about the importance of embedding sustainability early in product development. How does that shift impact timelines, cost, and engineering culture? A: This is a topic close to my heart. I’ve spent the last three years focused on embedding sustainability into product development, and it really does all start here. Around 80% of a product’s environmental footprint is determined at the design stage, so we must rethink how we define value, performance, and innovation. Embedding sustainability upfront does add time during the concept phase, but that investment pays off by reducing rework and helping avoid costly

The Chip Bag Project

July 1, 2025 No Comments

The Chip Bag Project, based in Detroit, is a sustainability initiative that upcycles hard-to-recycle snack packaging — particularly chip bags — into insulated sleeping bags for individuals experiencing homelessness. Founded by Eradajere Oleita, the project addresses both environmental waste and housing insecurity by transforming materials like Mylar into practical, thermally efficient solutions. In June, Oleita was among Trelllis’s 30 Under 30, its annual recognition of the brightest young stars among sustainability professionals. SBN Detroit interviewed Oleita about the origins of the project, the process of upcycling waste into resources, and the intersection of environmental justice and social equity in Detroit. Q: What first inspired you to create The Chip Bag Project—and why chip bags specifically? A: It started during the COVID lockdown. I came across a video of someone transforming snack wrappers into blankets, and it sparked something. At that time, I had already been teaching sustainability in Detroit schools, often explaining what can and can’t be recycled—and why. Chip bags always came up as a frustrating example. But when I realized the material — Mylar — is the same used in emergency blankets, it came together for me. The material is reflective, lightweight, waterproof, and retains body heat. So instead of trying to recycle chip bags through a broken system, why not repurpose them into something useful? Turning them into sleeping bags made practical sense. Q: Can you walk us through the upcycling process – how do chip bags become thermal sleeping bags? A: Once we receive the materials—chip bags, coffee bags, bread bags—we sort and wash them. Some are donated locally, others are mailed in from around the country. After cleaning, we cut the bags and use a thermal process to fuse them into sheets. Then we add insulation, often repurposed from Blue Apron food packaging, and assemble the final product into a sleeping bag. It’s a full-circle upcycling system. Every component, from the outer layer to the cushioning, is reused. Q: What were some of the biggest technical or logistical challenges you’ve faced? A: The biggest challenge was inventing a process that didn’t exist. We had to figure out how to sanitize the materials, fuse them safely, and do it all in a way that aligned with our sustainability values. As we’ve grown, space has become a major issue. We’ve collected over 2.5 million pounds of material to date, but we still don’t have a dedicated physical facility, but we are working on that. We’re also focused on ensuring that all of our processes are sustainable. We are constantly asking ourselves, “How much energy are we using? Can we offset it? Are we scaling in a truly sustainable way?” Q: How do you source materials and volunteers? Has the community been supportive? A: Absolutely. I don’t even eat chips! So when I first started, I needed help collecting bags. I put the call out on social media, and the community responded immediately. From there, partnerships developed – with schools, festivals, companies, and individuals. The entire model is rooted in collective action. Volunteers also are critical. They help with everything from washing bags to assembling kits. The people who support this work have truly shaped its direction. Q: The project sits at the intersection of environmental sustainability and social justice. How do you see those two issues as connected? A: Environmental justice and social justice are two sides of the same coin. For example, pollution becomes a public health crisis. Contaminated water becomes a housing or equity issue. Climate change displaces people. In Detroit, we’ve seen it all — air and water quality problems, housing shortages, flooding from extreme rain. This city is at the epicenter of so many intersecting challenges. Detroit is also a place of innovation and resilience. That’s why it was so important to start the project here. It serves as both a proving ground and a case study for what’s possible when we combine environmental action with community-centered design. Q: What impact have you seen so far? A: The response has been incredible. We’ve distributed thousands of winter kits that include our thermal bags, gloves, socks, and hygiene supplies. Each year during our warming tent drives, we also listen. The unhoused community has helped shape our product — suggesting more insulation, more comfort. It’s a conversation. There’s also a behavioral shift happening. People are saving Mylar bags at home. Schools are integrating sustainability into their classrooms. Even corporations are reaching out to partner with us. This year we received a grant from EGLE to install chip bag collection kiosks in grocery stores across Southeast Michigan. Q: What do you wish more people understood about upcycling — and the connection between environmentalism and equity? A: That it’s accessible. Upcycling isn’t a high-concept lifestyle — it’s what so many families already do out of necessity. Growing up in different economic environments, I saw people reuse grocery bags, repurpose clothes, and pass things down. That’s upcycling. If we hold ourselves accountable for even small actions – reusing, repurposing, buying differently – we can reduce our waste footprint and shift larger systems. Equity and environmentalism go hand in hand when we center the everyday choices people make in their homes. Q: What’s next for The Chip Bag Project? Are you planning to scale or expand your reach? A: Yes. We recently received a grant to install those chip bag kiosks I mentioned. For a while, we had to stop collecting because we simply ran out of room. Now, we’re looking for a permanent facility to serve as both a workspace and a storage hub. We’re also launching a school-year program and working to get our curriculum certified for broader use across the country. Our five-year anniversary is coming up, and we’re planning to use that moment to raise funds and build even more momentum. This summer, we’re continuing our monthly neighborhood cleanups — teaching plastic education and giving back. We also do corporate team-building events, like the one with StockX on 313 Day, where employees helped assemble