Technology-Driven Air Quality Monitoring Gains Traction in Detroit
JustAir, a Detroit-based startup cofounded by Darren Riley leverages data and technology to provide hyperlocal air quality insights, largely in urban areas. By deploying a network of air monitors, JustAir delivers real-time data that communities, policymakers, and environmental justice groups can use to push for meaningful action. With funding from initiatives that include Google for Startups Black Founders Fund, the company is building systems that aim to transform how cities like Detroit manage air quality challenges. SBN Detroit interviewed Riley to learn about the broader implications of air quality monitoring, the challenges of implementing these systems, and how accessible data can drive public health improvements and policy changes. Q: Why is air quality monitoring critical in urban environments like Detroit? A: Detroit has a history of industrial pollution and high traffic volumes, especially in areas like Southwest Detroit, where I live. These factors contribute to some of the worst asthma rates in the country. Traditionally, air quality data has been collected on a regional level, offering only a broad overview. But air pollution isn’t uniform across a city – it can vary dramatically from one block to the next. Localized data helps us understand where the worst impacts are happening, who is most affected, and when conditions are at their worst. This kind of granular information is essential for designing targeted interventions going forward. Q: How does air quality monitoring technology work? A: Traditional air monitoring relies on a handful of monitors spread across a large area, often providing limited insights. Our software facilitates and integrates multiple air monitors within a single area, sometimes scaling up to 50 or 75 units. These monitors collect data in real time, creating a detailed picture of air quality at a hyperlocal level. We don’t manufacture the monitors ourselves – we work with partners to deploy them. Our software acts as the brain, aggregating data and managing the network. The idea is to provide actionable insights that can help residents, and, also down the road, policymakers and stakeholders in cities like Detroit better understand their air quality challenges and begin to determine how to better manage them. Q: What is an example of your work in Southeast Michigan? A: We have a three-year contract with Wayne County, which, before this partnership, had just seven or eight monitors managed by EGLE (Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy). We added 100 monitors across the county so now every community has at least one monitor. Residents can sign up to get alerts – they can subscribe to individual monitors in their area or around a particular school or place of worship, etc. They can set when they want to receive alerts. This is a customizable service and it’s free – anyone can visit JustAir.app/signup right now and sign up to receive those alerts. The county Department of Health Human & Veterans Services is our lead partner on this project and they’re diving into the data to better understand the air across the community. They’ll be able to use this information to improve the health, safety, and well-being of county residents. Q: What unique challenges do urban environments like Detroit face in addressing air quality? A: Urban air quality is influenced by a combination of mobile sources – like cars and trucks – and stationary sources, such as factories. Detroit’s high traffic volume, especially near international border crossings, adds to the problem. Wind patterns also play a role; on certain days, pollution can settle in specific neighborhoods, exacerbating the issue. Q: How does technology, particularly AI, help address these challenges, and what opportunities do you see for the future? A: Currently, we leverage AI to ensure the validity and accuracy of our data. This is crucial for providing communities with reliable information. We’re now moving into the next phase, where we aim to use AI to recommend actionable solutions for mitigating air quality issues. AI allows us to dig deeper into the root causes of pollution. It helps us analyze data patterns—such as specific pollutants, weather conditions, and wind patterns—to pinpoint sources of air pollution with greater confidence. By marrying environmental context with real-time data, we can provide more accurate insights. Looking ahead, the goal is to utilize these rich data sets to empower communities and policymakers to take informed action. We’re on the cusp of this now. Q: What are the challenges of deploying and maintaining air quality monitors in urban environments? A: Deployment involves hurdles like site selection, insurance, and technical logistics. Maintenance can be another challenge – we need to ensure data accuracy at all times. Our software includes an automated quality assurance system to detect and flag issues, ensuring the community gets reliable information. Q: JustAir recently received funding from Google. How will this investment be used? A: We’re one of ten companies nationwide to receive this funding, which is a great validator for us. Google conducted thorough technical due diligence, confirming that our technology is on the right track. We’re using the funding to enhance our AI capabilities, particularly in integrating contextual data with air quality metrics as I spoke about. The funding allows us to explore new solutions that can help inform and enforce public health policies. Q: How do you measure the success of your air quality monitoring initiatives? A: We have both short- and long-term metrics. In the short term, we focus on network reliability and user engagement—how often people access the data and whether they find it valuable. High engagement is a strong indicator that the information is meeting community needs. In the long term, we aim to measure health outcomes and policy impacts. For example, are asthma-related emergency visits declining in neighborhoods with high air quality awareness? Are cities using our data to implement more effective policies? Q: What does the future look like for JustAir? A: We’ve scaled significantly since launching three years ago, now partnering with 20 organizations across seven states. The future is about leveraging these networks to drive outcomes — working
EV Infrastructure Has Funding – When Will There Be Stations?
Three years ago, under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Congress allocated $5 billion in federal funding to establish the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Program. This initiative aims to develop charger networks across each state to support electric vehicles (EVs). Of this funding, $110 million was earmarked for Michigan, covering the period through fiscal year 2026. However, the state has not yet seen the installation of any new power stations. As part of this effort, Red E Charging LLC – an EV infrastructure developer and charging network based in Detroit – has been awarded several NEVI contracts to install and manage in Michigan and a number of other states. SBN Detroit interviewed Red E Charging Founder Abass El-Hage about the timeline, barriers, and factors specific to Michigan regarding power station installation. Q: Since the announcement in 2021 of the $5 billion in federal funding just 11 EV stations have been installed across seven states, with none in Michigan to date. From your perspective, why is this? A: There are several reasons. First, this is a new process and it took time to get organized, generate RFPs, and kick it off. RFPs were published at the end of last year and contracts were awarded early this year. Setting up the necessary paperwork is tedious and time-consuming, and around public funds, there is just a lot of due diligence required. There are also multiple and varied requirements around bonding that can take another six months to sort out. Identifying appropriate locations for the charging stations with the right amenities on the property that’s willing to host can be time-consuming. On top of that, regardless of how long the paperwork takes, working with the utilities and getting the right equipment and resources in place can take six months to a year. It’s simply an arduous process that takes time. Q: Do the requirements vary from state to state? A: Yes. Every state is different when it comes to execution under NEVI. In Texas and New Mexico, the NEVI process is pretty straightforward, but Texas has issues with utilities that can slow things down. I would say Michigan is the middle of the road. And the biggest hurdle here is the strict bonding requirements. Not every state requires bonding, but Michigan requires a five-year bond that’s not run of the mill. Q: Outside of NEVI projects, is every state different? A: Yes. Incentives are different in every state. Utilities are different. In Michigan, we are lucky to have DTE and Consumers Energy. They have been helpful and proactive, and they facilitate a lot. EGLE (Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy) and the EPA have been helpful in Michigan as well, helping to create infrastructure in off-highway locations that are still easily accessible at reasonable rates. Q: In Michigan, are the challenges different in the Upper Peninsula compared with the Lower Peninsula? A: Yes. With every project there are financials, and in the UP there are fewer people, there is less traffic, and therefore less charger usage. It’s harder to justify a project when you don’t make the money back as fast. Additionally, utilities in the Upper Peninsula impose demand charges, which are flat fees added to the electric bill. These charges can be quite substantial. When considering these costs, the financial viability of a project often becomes questionable. Q: How do you view the transition from gas to electric vehicles being understood and received by the public? A: It’s a mixed bag. I think there is still a stigma around charging and how difficult and inconvenient it could be. It’s a misconception in my opinion. I drive from Detroit to Chicago regularly and along that route, I can stop to charge just like stopping for gas. Also, I think there’s been mixed messaging to the public by the auto industry – especially here in Detroit. When there are recalls, or if an automaker commits to building x amount of EVs and then scales back, this sends mixed signals to the public. Q: How many contracts in Michigan has Red E Charging been awarded and what is the status? A: We’ve been awarded 12 NEVI contracts all over the state and an additional 60 fast charger projects across the state for EGLE and utilities. As I explained, the paperwork along with bonding requirements plus environmental approvals, site checks, and more make this a slow process. But we have notice to proceed and are moving forward with the first few now, so these will be underway. The actual installation takes just about two weeks. We were also awarded a project outside of NEVI with the City of Detroit to install public-facing chargers throughout the city. Q: Michigan aims to have enough infrastructure for 2 million EVs on the roads by 2030. Do you think this is possible? A: Yes, I think it can happen. DTE and Consumers Energy are very helpful when it comes to single-family and multifamily homes. It’s cost-effective to have a charger at your home. That drive from Chicago to Detroit I talked about … I think by the end of the year there will be chargers every 20 miles or so, eliminating any planning needed because people will feel confident they can stop whenever they need a charge. I think in the near future the logistics involved in an EV experience will be no different than driving a gas-powered vehicle. It’s just a different thing fueling the car. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Detroit 2030 District is Promoting Carbon-Free, High-Performance Built Environments
SBN Detroit interviews the executive director of the Detroit 2030 District, Connie Lilley. Connie has been working within the commercial built environment for over 25 years, with the last 16 years focusing on energy efficiency and sustainability. She has served on many industry trade groups, including past vice chair for the U.S. Green Building Council, Detroit Regional Chapter, where she implemented the popular My Green School Art Contest that runs annually throughout Michigan. Connie has received two awards from the National Women in Construction Detroit Chapter for being a green/sustainable leader. She has also volunteered for BOMA, IFMA, and the City of Detroit Green Task Force. Connie is a LEED AP, O & M (accredited professional, operations and maintenance) and has an MBA focusing on corporate sustainability. Q: Please tell me about Detroit 2030 District and your role. A: I am the executive director of the Detroit 2030 District, which is a nonprofit working with building owners and managers to help them reduce energy and water consumption and transportation emissions to and from their buildings. The movement promotes a carbon-free future, high-performance buildings, economic development, and environmental justice. The District is one of twenty-four 2030 Districts across North America, with three in Michigan – Grand Rapids, Detroit, and Ann Arbor. The Detroit 2030 District Is the fourth-largest District in the network, with over 51 million square feet committed. The District has 40 local nonprofit partners and 42 local businesses that support the program. The Detroit District was launched in 2017 with the support of the Michigan Department, of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. Q: Please elaborate on the work you are currently doing. A: We offer our building members resources and a robust calendar of educational opportunities to learn how to reduce energy and water consumption, transportation emissions, and operating expenses. We have three best practice groups, including houses of worship, venues, and museums, and multifamily. We assist our members in many ways, including helping them start an Energy Star Portfolio Manager Account to measure and track energy and water consumption and work towards reducing them. We also run many pilots on new technologies at member buildings, allowing our members to see if the technology is suitable for their buildings. We run webinars on relevant topics, including funding mechanisms, grant opportunities, renewables, green infrastructure, solar, etc. Q: You were instrumental in bringing a District to Detroit in 2017. What prompted this and what was the process of bringing this to Detroit? A: My industry colleague, Peggy Matta, and I talked for many years about the benefits of this type of program. We knew that Detroit had many aging buildings that would need renovation in the coming years. If Detroit were to make a comeback, healthy buildings and communities would be significant to the process and help to spur economic development. We both know it is best to consider energy efficiencies and other high-performance building techniques before a building is built or renovated. We felt we would be more successful in helping to rebuild Detroit if we educated many building owners at a time instead of one at a time. We had heard of the 2030 District Network and how it works. We thought it would be great to bring a District to Detroit. After working for several years with many volunteers and an exploratory committee, we became an Emerging 2030 District. After a lot of groundwork, and collaboration with municipalities, businesses, and nonprofits, our movement began to grow and finally became a full District in 2017. Peggy became the founder and Chair of the organization and is still very involved. Q: Are you pleased with the progress and impact you’ve been able to make? A: While there have been many ups and downs, including the pandemic, flooding, stormwater issues, and the political environment, we have made it through. Never in my wildest dreams did I think we would have 51 million square feet signed into our program. When we were first touting the benefits of reducing carbon emissions from the built environment, the conversation about the impact of climate change on the built environment was challenging. Many people didn’t understand the economic and health benefits of reducing a building’s carbon footprint. Since our inception, we have helped hundreds of building owners and facility managers understand how to measure, track and work to reduce energy and water consumption. Many building owners don’t have an energy manager or a sustainability professional who understands how to combat issues with climate challenges. We have implemented several successful programs, including a Museum Best Practice Group, which has gone national across all 2030 Districts. Our unique House of Worship Best Practices Group includes over 20 local congregations. This program partners with 15 different local businesses and the EPA for Congregations and has crafted a collaboration opportunity for all denominations. One of the District’s strengths is bringing together groups of people from different entities and organizations to collaborate on strategies. Our program provides various events and workshops that bring people together that may not have had the opportunity to meet before. Facility managers across the city can now collaborate and work together instead of in a silo. Sharing best practices reduces the time and effort a building owner/manager must put into understanding climate challenges and overcoming them. We launched the Detroit Energy Challenge along with the City of Detroit and the Michigan Battle of the Buildings. Our first awards breakfast took place this June. We will also be adding awards in the future for internal water consumption reduction. This competition is an excellent opportunity for us to recognize facility managers who have done a fantastic job reducing energy consumption and carbon footprint Our organization also supports a future benchmarking ordinance for the City of Detroit. We are hopeful to see this pass soon as it will allow building owners to benchmark their buildings. We have made great strides and relationships with the local utilities, including DTE and Detroit thermal. We work to understand their goals and missions
