Ecosphere Organics on Advancing Sustainable Biorefining
Ecosphere Organics, cofounded by Brittanie Dabney, is focused on innovating within the sustainable biorefining industry. By leveraging advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, the company aims to address critical challenges in resource recovery and material processing. The goal is to simplify the biorefining process, enabling companies to focus on developing sustainable end products rather than managing complex material recovery operations. Ecosphere is finalizing logistics and has run pilot programs, working toward launching with clients. SBN Detroit interviewed Dabney to learn more about the mission and technology behind Ecosphere Organics, the challenges it faces, and the opportunities she sees within the industry. Q: What is the driving force behind Ecosphere Organics, and what key problems does it aim to address? A: Our driving force is the urgent need to reduce the environmental impact of food and organic waste. Our goal is to help companies transition toward sustainable production practices by diverting valuable food waste from landfills and giving it a new purpose. Today, food waste is often simply discarded or composted, but there are many untapped opportunities to extract value from it. By refining food waste into components that can be used in industries like textiles, packaging, and bio-based chemicals, we can give companies the tools to be more sustainable while contributing to a circular economy. Q: What do these applications look like? A: Today, we focus primarily on pre-consumer waste, meaning clean food waste from sources like restaurant kitchens. This includes citrus peels, eggshells, coffee grounds—essentially, anything that hasn’t been contaminated by being on someone’s plate. By working with clean streams of waste, we can efficiently sort and sterilize the materials, which makes them ideal for biorefining. Take banana peels, for example. We can extract natural pigments from these peels, which can be used as dyes in the textile industry. Fibers from the banana stems can serve as fillers to reduce plastic content in consumer goods, and food-based fibers are also being explored as eco-friendly options in packaging. Right now, we’re focusing on converting food waste into powders that can be further refined for green chemicals, substrates for fermentation processes, or even bio-based fertilizers. Our approach is about seeing the full lifecycle of organic waste and giving it renewed purpose. Q: What work have you done to date? A: We officially launched in March 2024, and our early work has been focused on refining recipes for our material blends, bioplastics, and processes to scale. Right now, we’re working on logistics – figuring out how to streamline the collection of food waste suitable for urban areas, how to efficiently transport it to our location, and how to make it as easy as possible for food suppliers to collaborate with us. To that end we will be participating in a pilot program with Orange Sparkle Ball and Intermode, where there will be an autonomous robot to collect waste in Corktown and transport it to Ecosphere. By reducing reliance on diesel fuel trucks, this approach lowers emissions and makes the entire lifecycle of our raw materials more sustainable and cost-effective. Collecting waste locally not only supports a more efficient supply chain but also allows more businesses to join the bioeconomy in a sustainable way. Q: How do you leverage AI and how does this technology optimize the process? A: The biggest opportunity lies in scalability and efficiency. Advanced technology and AI will allow us to optimize everything from waste collection and processing to customized material selection. With these tools, we can better predict waste volumes, design adaptable systems, and improve the quality of the materials produced. AI in biorefining enables smarter, more sustainable processes that can be replicated across various regions and industries, supporting a broader shift toward a circular economy. AI also plays a role in educating companies. We can recommend specific applications for raw materials, such as high-quality pigments, bio-based fertilizers, or even bioplastics. AI will help predict material demand and recovery rates, which allows us to guide companies toward the best ways to integrate sustainable materials into their products. Our platform will also serve as a resource for companies involved in R&D or prototyping, providing valuable data on material properties and potential applications. Q: What are some of the biggest technological challenges you face? A: One major challenge is creating processing systems flexible enough to handle diverse organic waste streams. For example, different types of citrus peels—like oranges, lemons, and limes—often need to be manually separated before continuing the refining process. Designing a system that can automatically adjust to these varying feedstocks is complex, but we’re actively working on solutions. Another challenge is the inherent variability in organic waste itself. Restaurants source ingredients from different locations, resulting in diverse nutrient profiles. Designing systems that can consistently process this range of materials while maintaining the quality of the end product is a technical hurdle. Finally, ensuring the quality of our end materials is crucial. Integrating data into our platform to monitor and adapt our systems will be essential to maintaining the high standard we are aiming for across all processing operations. Q: Are there specific partnerships or collaborations in Southeast Michigan that you’re working on? A: We’ve built partnerships with local restaurants, food service providers, urban farms and composters such as Sanctuary Farms. We also collaborate with other tech providers like Orange Sparkle Ball for waste collection solutions. Additionally, we’ve partnered with educational institutions and nonprofits like Make Food Not Waste, Black Tech Saturdays, Wayne State University, and the College for Creative Studies. For example, during Detroit’s Month of Design, we hosted “Waste to Wonder,” a community-centered and educational event where artists used pigments derived from food waste to create art. We’re also hoping to work more closely with the City of Detroit and other municipalities, with the goal of integrating our biorefining systems into broader sustainability strategies. Q: What obstacles do companies face in adopting sustainable biorefining, and how do you help overcome them? A: One major obstacle is the perception that sustainable practices are prohibitively expensive or difficult to
Phinia’s Twin Focus: Efficiency Today and a Carbon-Free Future
Based in Auburn Hills, Mich., Phinia (NYSE: PHIN) is a publicly traded company spun off from BorgWarner in July 2023 that is dedicated to advancing sustainable mobility solutions. It specializes in fuel systems, electrical systems, alternative fuel technologies, and aftermarket products, Phinia aims to enhance fuel efficiency, reduce emissions, and help drive the transition to cleaner, low-carbon fuels. SBN Detroit interviewed Todd Anderson, Phinia’s Chief Technology Officer, to explore the implementation of alternative fuel systems and their real-world applications. Q: Phinia has allocated 78% of its research and development to fuel efficiency and alternative fuel technologies and 30% of that to zero- and low-carbon fuel systems. Can you tell us more about this initiative? A: We are committed to driving efficiencies today while moving toward a carbon-neutral and ultimately carbon-free future. It’s important not to focus solely on future technologies when there is a clear need to improve our current energy systems. By allocating 78% of our budget to fuel efficiency and alternative fuel technologies, we are addressing both immediate and long-term needs. This investment allows us to work on improving the systems that our customers currently use and are ordering while also investing in alternative fuels that will help us achieve decarbonization over time. Our funding applies to all aspects of our business. The research and development aspect, mentioned above, but also investing in other business functions, including manufacturing, supply chain, and quality to ensure that as a business we are ready to move forward into a new era. Q: Describe the different alternative fuel systems and what they are used to power today. A: Each of these fuel systems serves specific purposes and applications, providing a range of options for different vehicle types and needs. Advanced Gasoline Direct Injection (GDi) Systems are primarily used to power lighter vehicles, from passenger cars to medium-duty vehicles. Recently, we released a 500-bar GDi system with this higher pressure, designed to improve fuel economy and reduce emissions for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. Hydrogen fuel cell technology powers electric vehicles (EVs) using an onboard fuel cell that uses hydrogen as fuel. This system is suitable for a range of vehicles, from lighter passenger cars to medium-duty vehicles, and could be particularly efficient for delivery vehicles in controlled environmental settings. Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) technology is well-suited for heavier applications where high loads, continuous operation, and challenging environments are common, such as heavy commercial vehicles and medium commercial vehicles. Hydrogen ICE provides the power and performance expected from traditional diesel or gasoline systems but without harmful emissions to the environment. Q: How is developing technologies for alternative fuels different from working on traditional combustion engines? A: Interestingly, it’s quite similar in many ways. The ways in which we develop liquid fuel systems for gasoline or diesel engines are directly applicable as we move toward alternative fuels. The basic physical principles, such as combustion and fluid metering, remain the same. The difference lies in adapting and refining the elements of these systems to work with alternative fuels. For example, in a hydrogen internal combustion engine, hydrogen gas is injected into the combustion chamber instead of gasoline. While the core technology remains similar, we need materials that can seal and respond appropriately to hydrogen gas, along with some design refinements. Q: What are the main challenges in creating and adopting alternative fuel technologies? A: The technology to use alternative fuels in vehicles is already well understood and has been proven effective. However, the challenge lies in the ecosystem needed to support these fuels. Take hydrogen internal combustion engines (ICE) as an example. While we have vehicles running effectively with this technology, faster market adoption requires sustainable hydrogen production at a scale that isn’t currently available. The infrastructure to deliver this sustainable alternative fuel to the point of use also needs to be in place. Currently, the cost of hydrogen is higher than will be acceptable for a broad market adoption. In my discussions with government officials in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, my call to action has been clear: ensure sufficient production of renewable hydrogen while developing the infrastructure needed to deliver it. This will help reduce costs and support wider adoption. Q: What do you see as the biggest opportunities for growth and innovation in alternative fuels? A: We see significant growth opportunities in the transportation sector, whether in passenger cars or commercial vehicles. In the shorter term, there is substantial interest in commercial vehicles due to their specific operating conditions. For example, there is great potential with captive fleets operating on fixed routes, where we can achieve significant progress without needing to rely on widespread public infrastructure for hydrogen deployment. This allows us to make meaningful advancements in those areas. Additionally, there is interest in alternative fuels beyond just transportation. We’re seeing opportunities in industrial applications, marine sectors, and stationary power generation. Industries like marine shipping, especially large vessels, are actively exploring alternative fuels. So, while there are significant opportunities in transportation, they extend far beyond that sector. Q: How does Phinia work with partners in the alternative fuel industry? Can you share any recent partnerships? A: Partnerships are critical for us — no company can operate as an island. We partner with government bodies such as the U.S. Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the European Commission, and the UK Transport Authority. We also work closely with our customers to support their vehicle roadmaps and align our innovations to meet their needs. We have close partnerships with universities and educational institutions, which provide access to their innovative and advanced thinking while supporting communities and students alike. In addition, collaboration with our supply chain partners is vital. Q: How does Phinia ensure sustainability is integrated into product design and development, particularly with your “Design for Environment” approach? A: Sustainability is critical in the design process. Our design reviews include considerations like the potential for remanufacturing and the end-of-life designation for products, which are vital elements of a circular
$129M From IRA Boosts Michigan’s Wind, Solar Plans
According to an announcement made by the state and federal governments in July, Michigan is set to receive a significant financial boost to aid in the expansion of large wind and solar projects. Specifically, $129 million in federal funds has been designated to streamline the processes involved in siting, zoning, and permitting large-scale renewable energy installations. This initiative aligns with the state’s goal to rapidly decarbonize its electric grid over the next decade. The funding, part of a $4.3 billion allocation being distributed across the United States, is sourced from the 2022 federal Inflation Reduction Act’s Climate Pollution Reduction Grant program. SBN Detroit interviewed Joel Howrani Heeres, director of community resilience at Public Sector Consultants, who also was Detroit’s first sustainability director, for his thoughts regarding how the money should and will be spent, potential challenges, geographical impact, and other topics. Q: Michigan recently received $129 million in federal funding to advance large wind and solar projects. How do you see it being allocated and what are the biggest priorities to address in terms of large wind and solar? A: I think that the state is rightfully deploying this money to help incentivize local governments to permit solar and wind projects within their boundaries. We have a very aggressive goal to achieve as a state – 60% renewable energy by 2030. The funds provide a significant incentive for communities to host renewable energy infrastructure, offering up to $5,000 per megawatt. Rural areas often lack the resources and personnel needed to review permits and manage other aspects of developing this infrastructure. This financial support will be instrumental in helping these communities navigate the complexities involved in such projects. Q: The funding comes from the Federal Climate Pollution Reduction Grants (CPRG) program, created by the Inflation Reduction Act. Can you tell us more about this and its specific influence in Michigan? A: The CPRG is one of the first grant programs to enable both planning and implementation to address climate change. There is funding allocated for metropolitan areas above a certain size. To me, this regional approach makes a lot of sense. Emissions don’t stop at city boundaries. For example, there are many heavy industries on the Detroit/Melvindale border that impact that whole area and beyond. Taking a regional approach and also statewide grants have been used to help EGLE do their planning as well. I was disappointed to see that Michigan’s metro areas did not get implementation money from this grant, but accelerating renewables throughout the state is important. Q: What are the challenges that come with such large-scale complex projects in Michigan? A: First, local permitting and project development. The amount of land required for renewable energy installations presents another challenge, especially in rural areas where agricultural land is at a premium. Convincing these communities to accept large renewable installations, particularly when the power generated is likely to be consumed elsewhere, can be difficult. Discussing the benefits and costs of hosting these installations has become a political issue. Communities want to see tangible benefits and are reluctant to give up their land without adequate compensation. Thus, providing financial incentives to these communities could be an effective approach. Another important consideration is determining, from a grid perspective, the most strategic locations to connect these large installations to ensure efficient power transmission. Q: Is there a long runway with projects like this from an execution and timeline standpoint? A: Yes, there is. The process from conceptualization to actual ground-breaking involves numerous steps. This includes navigating the political landscape, such as public hearings and potential opposition. Additionally, there are essential stages like securing permits and installing infrastructure. Each of these components requires considerable time and careful planning. Q: Is there a geographical component? What areas of Michigan will be most impacted? A: Rural areas will be impacted the most. Beyond that, I don’t think there will be geographic concentration, I think it will spread across the state. Q: Do you foresee local opposition from Michiganders regarding these projects, and, if so, what are your thoughts on how to address this? A: Yes. Just the other day I was driving through Washtenaw County and saw signs that read “No Industrial Solar.” The focus returns to the tangible benefits of these installations. It is essential for people to see clear advantages. For instance, if a local government receives $5,000 per megawatt to enhance local services — funds that would not have been available otherwise — it can help alleviate some of the opposition to these projects. This financial support can be directed toward improving community services, thereby showcasing the positive community benefits of the installations. Q: Federal money will also flow to workforce development programs. What are your thoughts on how these projects may boost the economy and put people in jobs? A: It’s a crucial aspect of our current situation. We are undergoing a significant energy transition, shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, which represents a fundamentally different model. This transition requires Michiganders to acquire new skills to compete in the emerging green economy. Additionally, we’re moving toward the electrification of everything. By producing clean energy, we can electrify our homes, cars, and various aspects of our lives, as it all comes from a sustainable source. There is a critical need to retrain workers from the fossil fuel sector to participate in the electrified economy. Significant investments are being made in this area. Ultimately, this is a comprehensive ecosystem, and these changes will impact labor across all sectors. Q: What other ancillary benefits can we expect to accompany the execution of these projects? A: As we transition more of the energy load to cleaner technology, we’ll have less localized pollution, leading to statewide public health benefits. Additionally, there’s a significant potential for economic development. Michigan stands out as one of the most proactive states in terms of climate ambitions, which could attract industries seeking to operate on green power. Whether it’s tech companies, manufacturing firms, or other businesses, the state’s commitment to sustainability
