Navigating Sustainability in Commercial EVs
Sustainability is a key focus in transportation, and commercial electric vehicles (EVs) come with their own set of challenges and opportunities. From extending EV range to tackling infrastructure and regulatory issues, progress demands both innovation and collaboration. The Shyft Group, a Novi, Michigan-based manufacturer of specialty vehicles, has been working to align its operations and product development with sustainability goals. SBN Detroit interviewed Josh Sherbin, chief legal, administrative, and compliance officer, to discuss the company’s approach to sustainability, the challenges of EV adoption in the commercial sector, and the broader implications for the transportation industry. (Note: On Dec. 16, 2024, after this interview was conducted, Shyft announced that it plans to merge with Switzerland-based Aebi Schmidt Group. The transaction is expected to close by mid-2025.) Q: How does the Shyft Group approach sustainability in product development strategies? A: Sustainability is integrated into all aspects of our product development. This reflects our commitment to environmental stewardship while meeting customer demands for efficient and responsible solutions. Our Blue Arc Class 4 EV truck, developed over the past three years, exemplifies our commitment to sustainability. Throughout its development, we’ve collaborated across the company to align operational priorities with environmental priorities. The results in a purpose-built, zero-emissions solution designed to address the specific needs of our commercial customers. Q: Blue Arc has achieved a range of greater than 200 miles between charges. What technological advancements have contributed to this milestone? A: Key advancements include regenerative braking, which recaptures energy to extend range; lightweight construction using aluminum for the cabin and shelving; and fast-charging capabilities that allow charging times of just two to six hours. These features were refined through extensive real-world testing to ensure reliability, environmental responsibility, and performance under demanding conditions. Q: Many commercial EVs have a range of around 160 miles. What are the challenges in extending EV range, particularly for commercial vehicles? A: Achieving greater range requires balancing several factors. For example, we need to optimize battery weight without compromising payload capacity. Efficiency under adverse operating conditions, such as extreme weather or rough roads, is another key consideration. We’ve worked to enhance range without sacrificing performance or customer needs. Q: What are some broader industry challenges in the commercial EV sector? A: The commercial EV sector is advancing rapidly, with last-mile delivery emerging as a practical application due to predictable routes and centralized charging. However, challenges remain. Expanding a reliable charging network is crucial for fleet operations, as the current infrastructure does not fully meet high-capacity needs. Upfront EV costs can pose challenges for smaller operators, despite potential long-term savings in fuel and maintenance. Additionally, sourcing sustainable materials for batteries and ensuring vehicles meet rigorous safety and performance standards add complexity to design and development. These challenges are being addressed through ongoing innovation and collaboration across the industry. Q: Are there regulatory, technological, or infrastructural barriers that still need to be addressed? A: Regulatory frameworks need to continue to evolve to better support the adoption of commercial EVs. Technological advancements in battery performance, including faster charging and cost reductions, are also critical to improving fleet efficiency and reducing downtime. Infrastructure remains a key focus, with a need for high-capacity chargers and strategically placed stations along logistics routes. Lastly, workforce training and development are essential to support the transition to EVs. Technicians require specialized skills to maintain and repair electric drivetrains and battery systems, while operators benefit from education on optimizing fleet efficiency. With continued collaboration between manufacturers, policymakers, and infrastructure providers, along with investments in workforce development, these barriers can be addressed, enabling a smoother transition to zero-emission commercial fleets. Q: How are material recycling and recovery implemented across your manufacturing processes? A: Recycling and recovery are core elements of our approach to sustainability, and these efforts reflect the dedication of our teams across the company. In 2023, 74% of our products were recyclable, and 59% incorporated recycled or remanufactured materials. We also leverage advanced technologies like laser fabrication machines and water recirculation systems to conserve resources. Other measures include high-efficiency LED lighting, paint booths designed for minimal energy use, and speed doors that help conserve heat. These practices are part of our broader mission to reduce our environmental impact while fostering clean, safe work environments. Q: Do you have any specific partnerships or collaborations in Southeast Michigan that have been instrumental in reaching sustainability goals? A: Collaboration is central to our approach. Internally, our Shyft for Good initiative supports environmental stewardship and community engagement. We partner with organizations like Habitat for Humanity and the Manufacturing Institute to foster community development and talent pipelines. Locally, we collaborate with the Lansing Economic Area Partnership to promote sustainable business development in the region. These efforts align with our mission to create positive environmental and social impacts while advancing sustainability. Q: Looking ahead, what are the next steps for the Shyft Group in terms of sustainability and innovation? A: We’re focused on continuing to reduce our environmental footprint through energy-efficient processes, expanded recycling programs, and reductions in waste and water use across manufacturing operations. Our “One” Shyft mindset reminds us that our greatest strength lies in our people. By working as one team, sharing best practices, and fostering collaboration across teams and brands, we deliver sustainable solutions that meet customer needs while driving progress for the broader industry. Together, with our customers and partners, we’re advancing zero-emission commercial fleet options, and contributing to meaningful change in transportation. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Safe Water Engineering – Tackling Water Safety in Southeast Michigan
Southeast Michigan faces significant challenges in water infrastructure and safety, particularly in addressing aging systems, lead contamination, and ensuring equitable access to clean drinking water. Safe Water Engineering LLC, a Detroit-based consulting firm founded by Elin Warn Betanzo, focuses on improving access to safe drinking water through engineering and policy solutions. As the architect behind Detroit’s lead service line replacement program, Betanzo has played a key role in improving water safety in the region. The city has replaced over 11,000 lead service lines since 2018, providing safer drinking water to thousands of residents. Beyond infrastructure, Betanzo’s work also focuses on water safety and affordability policies. SBN Detroit had the opportunity to interview Betanzo regarding the challenges and opportunities surrounding water management in Southeast Michigan, the lead pipe replacement efforts, and the steps needed to ensure sustainable and equitable access to clean water. Q: What is the impetus behind Safe Water Engineering? A: I started Safe Water Engineering in 2017 after the Flint water crisis revealed a critical need for specialized expertise in lead and drinking water safety. Our work focuses on helping water utilities meet and go beyond compliance requirements for drinking water safety and supporting communities by providing access to data, information, and education. Q: Can you tell us more about the city’s lead service line replacement program you designed and your work in drinking water policy? A: From 2017 to 2020, I worked with the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) to design the city’s lead service line replacement program. At the time, it wasn’t a regulatory requirement, but Detroit wanted to take a proactive approach. My work involved developing procedures for conducting lead service line replacements, incorporating replacements into broader infrastructure projects, conducting outreach to residents, and ensuring safety during replacements – like providing filters and flushing instructions. We also created a comprehensive program outlining responsibilities, timelines, and costs. The program is now underway, and the city has committed to replacing all lead service lines within ten years. Q: What are the biggest challenges communities in Southeast Michigan face in ensuring clean and safe water? A: Southeast Michigan’s water infrastructure relies on the backbone of water and sewer mains that Detroit built during the last century. It was designed and constructed for the time when it was built – a different population distribution and climate conditions than we have now. Over time, the region has faced significant changes, including population shifts, aging infrastructure, and climate impacts like altered precipitation patterns. Key challenges include the need to renew and replace aging water mains, sewer systems, and lead service lines, many of which were installed during the first half of the last century. Additionally, when water rates were set in many communities, they did not account for the necessary infrastructure renewal costs especially when they relied on existing infrastructure to expand. This becomes a challenge when we see this multitude of issues and challenges coinciding. It is essential to ensure public health protection is maintained as a top priority while developing water affordability programs to ensure everyone can afford access to that protection. Q: How has climate change impacted water systems in the region, particularly with issues like flooding, stormwater management, and aging infrastructure? A: The magnitude and frequency of extreme rainfall events have increased significantly in recent years, with Southeast Michigan experiencing multiple 100-year storms within a five-year span. The current infrastructure was not designed to handle such high volumes of water, leading to challenges like stormwater runoff overwhelming wastewater systems, and causing untreated releases into the Detroit River and Lake St. Clair. Additionally, urban development has created more paved surfaces, increased runoff, and disrupted natural drainage systems. This combination has led to significant flooding issues, further straining aging wastewater and stormwater systems. Q: Why are lead service lines a concern, and what is being done to address them in Southeast Michigan? A: In Michigan, community water systems were required to report the potential presence of lead service lines to the state in 2020. Statewide, up to 26% of these systems may have lead service lines, with Southeast Michigan particularly affected. For example, Detroit alone has up to 108,000 lead service lines, and potentially twice as many may exist in the surrounding communities. When water – although treated with corrosion control at treatment plants – passes through leaded materials, lead is frequently measured at the faucet – the point where it becomes drinking water. Lead in drinking water poses a significant health risk, as it is a neurotoxin with no safe level of exposure. Michigan was the first state that required mandatory lead service line replacement, mandating the removal of all lead service lines by 2041. A new federal rule accelerates this timeline nationally, requiring removal by 2037. Utilities are also required to notify residents if their home has lead pipes, enabling them to take precautions like using certified lead-reducing filters, which are highly effective when properly maintained. Q: What are the challenges involved in making Southeast Michigan’s drinking water safer and more affordable? A: Unlike housing, food, and electricity, Michigan lacks a statewide water affordability program. Rising water rates to fund infrastructure upgrades have made water unaffordable for some households, despite the public health necessity of these investments. There are programs like the Great Lakes Water Authority’s WRAP Program and DWSD’s Lifeline Plan, but the need for support exceeds the current resources available. Legislation to create a statewide water affordability program is under consideration, but challenges remain in addressing the broader affordability gap. Q: What strategies or technologies are being implemented to address lead contamination, and what additional steps are necessary beyond lead pipe replacement? A: Lead service line replacement is critical, but residents don’t have to wait for this to happen to reduce their exposure to lead in water. Certified lead-reducing filters are available and highly effective, provided they are properly maintained. Public education is essential to ensure residents understand the risks and how to take action. Additionally, programs like the Michigan Department of Health
Beacon Manufacturing – Supporting LEV Innovation at Newlab
Newlab at Michigan Central is home to a new 10,000-square-foot center for manufacturers of light electric vehicles (LEVs) – two- and three-wheeled vehicles mostly used for short distances, such as e-scooters and e-bikes. The center, dubbed “BeaconLab,” is operated by the newly created Beacon Manufacturing and will operate as a prototyping and logistics services manufacturing consultant, coordinator, and manufacturing hub for startups. It is equipped with several bays of assembly stations and state-of-the-art advanced machinery for robotic wheel building, laser-tube cutting, and robotic welding, to accelerate startups’ journey from concept to scale. The company leases the space from Newlab and is paid a fee for service by clients. Beacon Manufacturing also owns the Detroit Bikes brand, which it purchased in May from Cardinal Cycling Group. SBN Detroit interviewed CEO Gary Thornton, who previously was general manager of Detroit Bikes, about plans for the center, trends in LEV mobility, and other topics. Q: Beacon Manufacturing is focused on prototyping and logistics services for light electric vehicle (LEV) manufacturers. Explain what this entails. A: Our work at Beacon Manufacturing is twofold. First, we focus on prototyping, helping startups move from concept to tangible products. We take initial designs and create physical prototypes, allowing companies to refine their ideas and demonstrate proof of concept. The second part involves logistics services, acting as a third-party logistics (3PL) provider. We rent warehouse space specifically tailored for LEVs. Our team manages everything from storing products to shipping them out, ensuring each vehicle is operational before it leaves the facility. This includes handling specific challenges related to LEV batteries and ensuring compliance with regulations. Q: What types of companies and vehicles do you work with? A: We primarily collaborate with companies focused on last-mile delivery solutions. These startups are experimenting with new vehicle designs – e-scooters, e-bikes, and even electric tricycles – to solve urban transportation issues. One example of our work is with Civilized Cycles, a Newlab-based startup developing an e-bike with a tricycle and trailer attachment. Their solution addresses congestion in cities like New York, where specific zones impose fees on larger vehicles. Using a smaller LEV, they can transport goods efficiently without contributing to traffic or emissions. Q: What is the market potential for LEVs? A: The LEV market is massive and largely untapped. The need for efficient, low-emission transportation in urban areas is growing rapidly. We’re seeing interest from companies large and small, all looking to shift away from traditional vehicles. Cities like New York, Paris, and others are exploring ways to reduce congestion and improve air quality by shutting down portions of the city to standard vehicles or charging usage fees. LEVs fit perfectly into this evolving landscape, providing a practical and sustainable solution for short-distance travel and deliveries. Detroit’s ecosystem is ideal for LEV development with its roots in automotive design and manufacturing. Within a 20-mile radius, you can find suppliers for almost any component. We are working on LEVs as mentioned to address the last mile of delivery or traffic congestion, and we are currently working on an extremely rugged LEV that can be used to deploy power grids remotely for farmers and everything in between. There is a constant quest to come up with ideas to push the limits within Newlab and Southeast Michigan. Q: What challenges do LEV manufacturers face when scaling production? A: The biggest hurdle is cost. Traditional auto suppliers aren’t set up for small runs, so startups often face prohibitively high quotes. We are set up to focus on the individual manufacturing processes and tailor solutions to their scale. Another challenge is managing expectations. Many entrepreneurs want a final product that’s perfect, but early prototypes need to prioritize function over aesthetics. Our role is to guide them through this process, ensuring they have a viable product to show investors or test in the market. Q: What types of collaborations do you facilitate, and how do these impact LEV development? A: We enable companies to focus on their core strengths, such as design and marketing, by handling their logistics, manufacturing, and shipping needs. Currently, our warehouse hosts four electric motorcycle brands, two e-bike brands, and even an electric snowmobile company. These collaborations foster a supportive environment where different players in the LEV space can learn from each other, share resources, and accelerate their growth. Q: How do you see the LEV market evolving in the next 5–10 years, particularly in Southeast Michigan? A: The LEV market is poised for explosive growth, much like the e-bike market has experienced. The acceptance of battery-powered tools and vehicles is spreading quickly. From electric lawnmowers to chainsaws, we’re seeing a cultural shift toward cleaner, more efficient technologies. In Southeast Michigan, the manufacturing expertise built over decades in the auto industry provides a strong foundation for LEV innovation. Detroit is uniquely positioned to become a hub for LEV development and production. Q: How has Newlab enhanced Beacon Manufacturing’s ability to innovate and scale? A: Newlab has been transformative for our operations. The state-of-the-art machinery and resources available here – CNC (computer numerical control) machines, cleanrooms for electronics, woodshops, and metal shops – allow us to tackle complex manufacturing challenges. The collaborative environment also plays a crucial role. Being part of a community of innovators means we’re constantly learning and pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in LEV manufacturing. What are your plans for BeaconLab as it relates to the LEV industry in Southeast Michigan and beyond? A: We’re focused on scaling our operations to meet the growing demand. At Newlab, we’ve set up five fully stocked workbenches that startups can rent to assemble their vehicles. This hands-on space allows entrepreneurs to bring their concepts to life. Additionally, we’re expanding our offsite facilities to accommodate larger manufacturing runs. Our new 20,000-square-foot warehouse will support startups ready to scale from prototypes to larger production runs of 100 or even 1,000 units. Also, I’m extremely optimistic about Detroit’s future in this space. The city’s deep manufacturing expertise, coupled with the growing demand for
Technology-Driven Air Quality Monitoring Gains Traction in Detroit
JustAir, a Detroit-based startup cofounded by Darren Riley leverages data and technology to provide hyperlocal air quality insights, largely in urban areas. By deploying a network of air monitors, JustAir delivers real-time data that communities, policymakers, and environmental justice groups can use to push for meaningful action. With funding from initiatives that include Google for Startups Black Founders Fund, the company is building systems that aim to transform how cities like Detroit manage air quality challenges. SBN Detroit interviewed Riley to learn about the broader implications of air quality monitoring, the challenges of implementing these systems, and how accessible data can drive public health improvements and policy changes. Q: Why is air quality monitoring critical in urban environments like Detroit? A: Detroit has a history of industrial pollution and high traffic volumes, especially in areas like Southwest Detroit, where I live. These factors contribute to some of the worst asthma rates in the country. Traditionally, air quality data has been collected on a regional level, offering only a broad overview. But air pollution isn’t uniform across a city – it can vary dramatically from one block to the next. Localized data helps us understand where the worst impacts are happening, who is most affected, and when conditions are at their worst. This kind of granular information is essential for designing targeted interventions going forward. Q: How does air quality monitoring technology work? A: Traditional air monitoring relies on a handful of monitors spread across a large area, often providing limited insights. Our software facilitates and integrates multiple air monitors within a single area, sometimes scaling up to 50 or 75 units. These monitors collect data in real time, creating a detailed picture of air quality at a hyperlocal level. We don’t manufacture the monitors ourselves – we work with partners to deploy them. Our software acts as the brain, aggregating data and managing the network. The idea is to provide actionable insights that can help residents, and, also down the road, policymakers and stakeholders in cities like Detroit better understand their air quality challenges and begin to determine how to better manage them. Q: What is an example of your work in Southeast Michigan? A: We have a three-year contract with Wayne County, which, before this partnership, had just seven or eight monitors managed by EGLE (Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy). We added 100 monitors across the county so now every community has at least one monitor. Residents can sign up to get alerts – they can subscribe to individual monitors in their area or around a particular school or place of worship, etc. They can set when they want to receive alerts. This is a customizable service and it’s free – anyone can visit JustAir.app/signup right now and sign up to receive those alerts. The county Department of Health Human & Veterans Services is our lead partner on this project and they’re diving into the data to better understand the air across the community. They’ll be able to use this information to improve the health, safety, and well-being of county residents. Q: What unique challenges do urban environments like Detroit face in addressing air quality? A: Urban air quality is influenced by a combination of mobile sources – like cars and trucks – and stationary sources, such as factories. Detroit’s high traffic volume, especially near international border crossings, adds to the problem. Wind patterns also play a role; on certain days, pollution can settle in specific neighborhoods, exacerbating the issue. Q: How does technology, particularly AI, help address these challenges, and what opportunities do you see for the future? A: Currently, we leverage AI to ensure the validity and accuracy of our data. This is crucial for providing communities with reliable information. We’re now moving into the next phase, where we aim to use AI to recommend actionable solutions for mitigating air quality issues. AI allows us to dig deeper into the root causes of pollution. It helps us analyze data patterns—such as specific pollutants, weather conditions, and wind patterns—to pinpoint sources of air pollution with greater confidence. By marrying environmental context with real-time data, we can provide more accurate insights. Looking ahead, the goal is to utilize these rich data sets to empower communities and policymakers to take informed action. We’re on the cusp of this now. Q: What are the challenges of deploying and maintaining air quality monitors in urban environments? A: Deployment involves hurdles like site selection, insurance, and technical logistics. Maintenance can be another challenge – we need to ensure data accuracy at all times. Our software includes an automated quality assurance system to detect and flag issues, ensuring the community gets reliable information. Q: JustAir recently received funding from Google. How will this investment be used? A: We’re one of ten companies nationwide to receive this funding, which is a great validator for us. Google conducted thorough technical due diligence, confirming that our technology is on the right track. We’re using the funding to enhance our AI capabilities, particularly in integrating contextual data with air quality metrics as I spoke about. The funding allows us to explore new solutions that can help inform and enforce public health policies. Q: How do you measure the success of your air quality monitoring initiatives? A: We have both short- and long-term metrics. In the short term, we focus on network reliability and user engagement—how often people access the data and whether they find it valuable. High engagement is a strong indicator that the information is meeting community needs. In the long term, we aim to measure health outcomes and policy impacts. For example, are asthma-related emergency visits declining in neighborhoods with high air quality awareness? Are cities using our data to implement more effective policies? Q: What does the future look like for JustAir? A: We’ve scaled significantly since launching three years ago, now partnering with 20 organizations across seven states. The future is about leveraging these networks to drive outcomes — working
Ecosphere Organics on Advancing Sustainable Biorefining
Ecosphere Organics, cofounded by Brittanie Dabney, is focused on innovating within the sustainable biorefining industry. By leveraging advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, the company aims to address critical challenges in resource recovery and material processing. The goal is to simplify the biorefining process, enabling companies to focus on developing sustainable end products rather than managing complex material recovery operations. Ecosphere is finalizing logistics and has run pilot programs, working toward launching with clients. SBN Detroit interviewed Dabney to learn more about the mission and technology behind Ecosphere Organics, the challenges it faces, and the opportunities she sees within the industry. Q: What is the driving force behind Ecosphere Organics, and what key problems does it aim to address? A: Our driving force is the urgent need to reduce the environmental impact of food and organic waste. Our goal is to help companies transition toward sustainable production practices by diverting valuable food waste from landfills and giving it a new purpose. Today, food waste is often simply discarded or composted, but there are many untapped opportunities to extract value from it. By refining food waste into components that can be used in industries like textiles, packaging, and bio-based chemicals, we can give companies the tools to be more sustainable while contributing to a circular economy. Q: What do these applications look like? A: Today, we focus primarily on pre-consumer waste, meaning clean food waste from sources like restaurant kitchens. This includes citrus peels, eggshells, coffee grounds—essentially, anything that hasn’t been contaminated by being on someone’s plate. By working with clean streams of waste, we can efficiently sort and sterilize the materials, which makes them ideal for biorefining. Take banana peels, for example. We can extract natural pigments from these peels, which can be used as dyes in the textile industry. Fibers from the banana stems can serve as fillers to reduce plastic content in consumer goods, and food-based fibers are also being explored as eco-friendly options in packaging. Right now, we’re focusing on converting food waste into powders that can be further refined for green chemicals, substrates for fermentation processes, or even bio-based fertilizers. Our approach is about seeing the full lifecycle of organic waste and giving it renewed purpose. Q: What work have you done to date? A: We officially launched in March 2024, and our early work has been focused on refining recipes for our material blends, bioplastics, and processes to scale. Right now, we’re working on logistics – figuring out how to streamline the collection of food waste suitable for urban areas, how to efficiently transport it to our location, and how to make it as easy as possible for food suppliers to collaborate with us. To that end we will be participating in a pilot program with Orange Sparkle Ball and Intermode, where there will be an autonomous robot to collect waste in Corktown and transport it to Ecosphere. By reducing reliance on diesel fuel trucks, this approach lowers emissions and makes the entire lifecycle of our raw materials more sustainable and cost-effective. Collecting waste locally not only supports a more efficient supply chain but also allows more businesses to join the bioeconomy in a sustainable way. Q: How do you leverage AI and how does this technology optimize the process? A: The biggest opportunity lies in scalability and efficiency. Advanced technology and AI will allow us to optimize everything from waste collection and processing to customized material selection. With these tools, we can better predict waste volumes, design adaptable systems, and improve the quality of the materials produced. AI in biorefining enables smarter, more sustainable processes that can be replicated across various regions and industries, supporting a broader shift toward a circular economy. AI also plays a role in educating companies. We can recommend specific applications for raw materials, such as high-quality pigments, bio-based fertilizers, or even bioplastics. AI will help predict material demand and recovery rates, which allows us to guide companies toward the best ways to integrate sustainable materials into their products. Our platform will also serve as a resource for companies involved in R&D or prototyping, providing valuable data on material properties and potential applications. Q: What are some of the biggest technological challenges you face? A: One major challenge is creating processing systems flexible enough to handle diverse organic waste streams. For example, different types of citrus peels—like oranges, lemons, and limes—often need to be manually separated before continuing the refining process. Designing a system that can automatically adjust to these varying feedstocks is complex, but we’re actively working on solutions. Another challenge is the inherent variability in organic waste itself. Restaurants source ingredients from different locations, resulting in diverse nutrient profiles. Designing systems that can consistently process this range of materials while maintaining the quality of the end product is a technical hurdle. Finally, ensuring the quality of our end materials is crucial. Integrating data into our platform to monitor and adapt our systems will be essential to maintaining the high standard we are aiming for across all processing operations. Q: Are there specific partnerships or collaborations in Southeast Michigan that you’re working on? A: We’ve built partnerships with local restaurants, food service providers, urban farms and composters such as Sanctuary Farms. We also collaborate with other tech providers like Orange Sparkle Ball for waste collection solutions. Additionally, we’ve partnered with educational institutions and nonprofits like Make Food Not Waste, Black Tech Saturdays, Wayne State University, and the College for Creative Studies. For example, during Detroit’s Month of Design, we hosted “Waste to Wonder,” a community-centered and educational event where artists used pigments derived from food waste to create art. We’re also hoping to work more closely with the City of Detroit and other municipalities, with the goal of integrating our biorefining systems into broader sustainability strategies. Q: What obstacles do companies face in adopting sustainable biorefining, and how do you help overcome them? A: One major obstacle is the perception that sustainable practices are prohibitively expensive or difficult to
Scrap Soils: Innovating with a Robotic Food Waste Collection Pilot Program
Scrap Soils is a Detroit-based nonprofit composting organization, focused on diverting food waste from landfills and transforming it into nutrient-rich compost. Scrap Soils partners with entities like Sanctuary Farms to promote sustainable food waste recovery, helping businesses and residents meet zero-waste goals. Its mission is to divert food waste from landfills, thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions and creating a sustainable local food cycle through composting. In 2023, Scrap Soils piloted a robot program in the Transportation Innovation Zone with support from the city’s Office of Mobility Innovation. The program used an autonomous robot for food waste collection to explore more sustainable and efficient ways of managing and transporting waste. SBN Detroit talked to Scrap Soils co-founder Ricky Blanding about the pilot program, and composting in Detroit. Q: How did you develop the idea for Scrap Soils? What was the driving force behind it? A: I was working at the Whitney and also developing a deep interest in gardening. I began to recognize the immense value of composting in improving soil quality. At the same time, I noticed a significant issue with food waste — there was a clear gap between the waste generated and how it could be utilized productively. So the concept of Scrap Soils emerged from this realization. Composting can serve as a key tool in addressing food waste, turning it into something beneficial for the environment, businesses, and communities alike. Q: In what ways does composting help businesses and the community meet their zero-waste goals? A: Composting gives businesses a sustainable alternative for managing their food waste. Many companies are simply throwing food away because they may not have other options available to them, and what we aim to do is close that food loop. By offering businesses an opportunity to compost, we ensure that the resources they are using — and paying to dispose of — are put back into a healthier and more sustainable food system. This creates a more robust solution for food waste recovery and helps businesses and residents alike see the value in contributing to a circular economy. Q: What are some of the partnerships you’ve established with local businesses and other organizations? A: Our primary farm partner is Sanctuary Farms, and through that relationship, we’re looking at expanding partnerships with multiple farms to broaden our reach. We’re particularly focused on districts 4, 5, and 6 in Detroit. We’re also working closely with the West Village Business Association—West Village is where our home base is, and we want to be impactful in that community. Beyond that, we’ve partnered with The Schvitz, AAA, and Renaissance High School. Each of these partnerships helps us connect with different parts of the community to extend our mission of food waste recovery. We are still very new and see growth on the horizon. Q: How do you think getting businesses on board to compost contributes to Detroit’s broader sustainability efforts, particularly in terms of reducing the city’s waste footprint? A: First, composting will reduce the amount of food waste going to landfills by closing the food loop through composting. But beyond the practical aspects, there’s a larger goal of shifting the overall mindset within the community and the city. Our mission isn’t just about waste — it’s about inspiring people to care more about their environmental impact. When you get businesses and individuals thinking about closing the food loop and diverting food waste, they typically start to think about other ways in which they can address sustainability. Q: What educational initiatives are you implementing to inform the community about composting and sustainability? A: Education is key. This summer, we collaborated with Renaissance High School to run a summer cohort program, where a group of students helped us fundraise for Scraps Soils. They learned essential skills like grant writing, networking, and fundraising, as well as the broader importance of composting. It’s not just about teaching them how to compost—it’s about giving them ownership over the future of sustainability in Detroit. Q: Do you have data on the amount of food waste diverted from landfills through your composting services? A: During our pilot program, we successfully composted 11,000 pounds of food waste. While we’re still compiling numbers for 2024, we are steadily growing, and over the next 6 to 12 months, we expect to see even more progress. Currently, we have just under 50 members, but the trajectory is promising, and we’re expanding at a consistent pace. Q: How did the idea for using a robot to collect food waste come about, and what were the primary objectives of the pilot program? A: The concept of composting and mobility intersecting is interesting. Managing trucks for food waste collection is expensive and resource-heavy, so we began to wonder if there might be more efficient ways to transport food waste. Detroit is a leader in mobility innovation, so it seemed like the perfect place to test this. The pilot program has allowed us to gather data and see how technology could streamline food waste collection in the future. Q: What were the environmental benefits of replacing traditional waste collection methods with a robot in terms of reducing emissions? A: A clear benefit is the reduction in emissions by eliminating the need for traditional trucks and the people and resources required to operate them. The robot helped us centralize the movement of food waste, removing the middleman and making the process more autonomous. We’re still analyzing the full impact of the pilot program, but it’s clear that mobility innovations like this can play a role in creating a more sustainable system. Q: How do you see technology shaping the future of waste management and composting in Southeast Michigan? A: We’re constantly learning about the evolving nature of mobility and how it connects to waste management. Looking ahead, I envision diversifying the types of vehicles we use and where the food waste ultimately goes. The city has been very engaged in observing the impact of our program, and we’ve gained valuable insights into
Reducing Carbon Footprint Across Global Operations
BorgWarner is a global automotive supplier that delivers mobility products to the market including turbochargers, electric transmissions, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, thermal management solutions, and more. Headquartered in Auburn Hills, Mich., BorgWarner operates in 21 countries with 82 locations and 40,000 employees. We interviewed Dr. Volker Wang, BorgWarner’s president and general manager of Turbos and Thermal Technologies, about the company’s work to reduce the company’s carbon footprint across several initiatives. Q: Given the sheer magnitude of your operations, how are sustainability practices translated and executed toward the goal of a 35% reduction in Energy Intensity? A: To be clear, BorgWarner doesn’t have an energy intensity reduction goal set. We have absolute GHG reduction goals. We’ve set specific sustainability goals to become carbon neutral by 2035 for Scope 1 and 2 emissions. We aim for an 85% reduction by 2030, based on our 2021 baseline, and a 25% reduction for Scope 3 emissions, based on our 2021 baseline. There are several initiatives in place to achieve this. First, we’ve developed a decarbonization toolbox that provides tailored recommendations to our facility leaders on reducing CO2 emissions. This toolbox is adaptable to different regions and processes, helping reduce energy use and identify opportunities for renewable energy generation. We’ve implemented smart metering across our facilities to measure real-time consumption of natural gas and electricity. This allows us to track energy usage more accurately and make necessary adjustments to meet our goals. We’ve integrated CO2 reduction and sustainability targets into our bonus and incentive system. To gauge our sustainability performance, BorgWarner conducts materiality assessments based on feedback from various stakeholders and aligns its efforts with global ESG reporting initiatives, such as those from the AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group). The company operates in a decentralized manner, empowering its global locations to make decisions and act on sustainability priorities that align with local needs. Q: What are the biggest challenges? A: The company has set clear sustainability targets and has mechanisms in place to support the achievement of those targets. However, even with the best-laid plans and intentions, we cannot predict or control the future. Many variables in play could alter circumstances, all around the world. That’s why it’s imperative to remain agile and flexible. Q: How do you measure and manage your supply chain’s carbon footprint and ensure compliance regarding their efforts around sustainability? A: In March we partnered with Manufacture 2030 – a decarbonization software provider. We use M2030 to track and manage our supplier’s CO2 emissions. Our suppliers use the software to report their emissions to us and gain access to best practices on how to reduce emissions. This tool is essential for monitoring and managing our suppliers’ progress. We incentivize our suppliers to set emissions reduction targets for themselves and their supply base by assigning points on our supplier scorecard, which is a major factor in deciding which suppliers are awarded business. Q: How does sustainability impact product design? A: This is an important question. There is so much related to product design. We are using software to show in real time to our designers what the CO2 footprint outcome will look like. This helps at the earliest stages to optimize the products. Our Design for Sustainability workstream is actively working to build processes into our design protocols to ensure maximum use of green materials, where feasible. Circularity is a big topic for us when it comes to battery packs and other materials. We look for second-life options in different applications. In short, we are utilizing engineering-driven initiatives that help to reduce CO2 from our product designs. Q: How is water management approached? A: We approach it at the local level. We conducted risk assessments in all of our facilities, and 14 are in the high or extremely high usage categories which is roughly 17% of our facilities worldwide, so we are putting initiatives in place where needed. For example, one of our facilities in New York has implemented a reverse osmosis process to treat wastewater instead of using soft water. This change is expected to decrease water discharge by approximately 7,500 gallons per day. Q: Are electric and hybrid vehicle sales growing at a pace that’s aligned with decarbonization goals? A: It’s not a secret the industry’s transition to electric vehicles is not trending at the rate expected. The industry is undergoing an unprecedented time of change. We provide a range of engines—combustion, hybrid, and electric—to meet our customers’ evolving needs during this transition. In 2023, 87% of our revenue was generated from EV and emissions-reducing combustion and hybrid products, including $2 billion in eProduct sales, marking a strong step forward toward decarbonization, though there’s still more ground to cover. Q: What are best practices you think other automotive suppliers can employ? A: It all starts with a mindset — focusing on doing what is right and addressing urgent challenges head-on. Taking real, tangible actions that drive improvements is far more impactful than simply producing reports. One key tool for us has been the Decarbonization Toolbox, which offers practical strategies that have been instrumental in helping our facilities start their sustainability journey. I think it’s critical to implement the same improvements within operations that are expected from suppliers. It has not been difficult to motivate our teams to participate. I think people want to be involved in this and they want to do the right thing. Seeing positive outcomes has motivated our employees to do more at a local level as well. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Green Door Initiative: Fostering Sustainability and Economic Growth
Founded in 2010 by native Detroiter Donele Wilkins, the Green Door Initiative is a Detroit-based nonprofit dedicated to advancing sustainability and environmental stewardship. It emphasizes developing green spaces, revitalizing urban areas, empowering communities, and workforce development tailored to the green energy sector. In March, Wilkins was appointed to serve on the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council established by President Biden under Executive Order 14008 of January 27, 2021, to tackle the climate crisis here and around the world. SBN Detroit interviewed Wilkins about the vision and the progression of the Green Door Initiative and how serving on the advisory council will impact its trajectory. Q: What is the impetus behind the Green Door Initiative? A: The Green Door Initiative is an environmental justice nonprofit organization based in Detroit. Our mission is to ensure that everyone, regardless of race or ZIP code, is environmentally literate and capable of promoting and living a sustainable lifestyle. We achieve this through several programs and initiatives. First, we offer community education and access to resources – opportunities for residents and community members to learn about environmental protection and improve their daily lives. Through workshops and awareness programs, we translate complex information into actionable steps, helping individuals access resources to enhance their environmental conditions. Another big focus of ours is workforce development. Here, we focus on increasing the capacity of residents to compete in the environmental and green sectors. Our 12-week training program has a 92% job placement rate, offering underrepresented and underserved individuals opportunities to become certified and licensed for well-paying, family-supporting jobs. This program covers various environmental and green-collar jobs, addressing climate change, pollution removal, and more. We also engage youth in this program. Every summer, we employ high school students to support their transition into leadership roles and career planning. And finally, we work to impact public policy related to environmental health, advocating for equal protection to mitigate issues such as poor air quality, and unsafe drinking water. We advocate for investments and resources that mitigate climate impacts, ensuring that our communities are heard in decision-making processes and receive the necessary support. Q: What types of jobs does your workforce development program help people secure? A: We train individuals for diverse careers in the environmental and green sectors. We specialize in placing certified professionals in roles related to environmental cleanup, including handling hazardous materials and addressing pollution. We also support job placement in energy audits and solar installation, helping individuals improve energy efficiency and contribute to renewable energy projects. Additionally, we facilitate apprenticeships, particularly in electrical fields linked to green energy. Our network extends to disaster response roles, where individuals assist with emergency food and water distribution, and to various general green sector positions. We continuously seek out potential career opportunities in the environmental field. Q: What other initiatives are you pursuing in workforce development? A: We’re actively involved in several projects related to workforce development. One major initiative is our Air Quality Management Project, which we started with funding from the EPA. This involves installing air monitoring systems and collecting real-time data to share with the community. We are also focused on community outreach, training residents on the significance and use of this data. Additionally, we’ve created job opportunities through our training programs. Several participants have been hired for internships and full-time positions as air monitor installers. We’ve also partnered with Just Air, a for-profit company, to fulfill a contract with Wayne County for installing 100 air monitors. This collaboration allowed us to employ our trainees and demonstrate our capability to meet local needs. Q: What is the economic impact of green jobs? A: It’s huge. These roles are among the fastest-growing job trends that exist today, and they significantly benefit local economies. Green jobs contribute to environmental restoration and adaptation, aiding communities in recovering from storms and other environmental challenges. As the shift toward electric vehicles and related infrastructure accelerates, more job opportunities arise, creating synergy with the auto industry. Our 12-week program trains several cohorts of 25-30 individuals quarterly, offering comprehensive education in environmental and green-collar sectors. This training spans various fields, including solar installation, and prepares participants for diverse opportunities, benefiting both large and small contractors. To date, we’ve graduated 1,700 individuals from our program. Q: Does Green Door focus on manufacturing jobs, given the industry’s significance in Detroit? A: Yes, we do engage with manufacturing jobs, including those related to solar panel assembly. For example, we’ve partnered with companies involved in solar panel manufacturing and installation. We’ve also established a company – 313 Solar – that is not yet launched, which will aim to handle the full spectrum of solar panel operations, from manufacturing to maintenance. We’re actively collaborating with companies planning to set up in Wayne County and working with the Department of Economic Development and other partners. These companies often seek grants and will recruit from our trained workforce, ensuring alignment with industry needs and sustainability goals. Q: Can you expand on the community education you offer and its impact on Southeast Michigan? A: We’ve provided approximately 25,000 hours of community awareness training. Our focus includes educating people on navigating permit hearings and understanding environmental protection at local, state, and federal levels. We cover environmental health impacts, such as the effects of poor air quality on health. We also address misconceptions, such as victims being blamed for their health issues due to lifestyle choices like poor diet or smoking. We engage in discussions about food deserts and other systemic issues, aiming to shift the trajectory by proactively influencing development and policy changes. Q: What impact do you have on local businesses? A: We help local businesses access talent they might not have considered. Many companies struggle to fill positions or find the right skill set, and we provide solutions by presenting qualified candidates. Businesses are often surprised by the high quality of the individuals we connect them with. We encourage businesses to reach out and have a conversation with us. Our team of job developers
$129M From IRA Boosts Michigan’s Wind, Solar Plans
According to an announcement made by the state and federal governments in July, Michigan is set to receive a significant financial boost to aid in the expansion of large wind and solar projects. Specifically, $129 million in federal funds has been designated to streamline the processes involved in siting, zoning, and permitting large-scale renewable energy installations. This initiative aligns with the state’s goal to rapidly decarbonize its electric grid over the next decade. The funding, part of a $4.3 billion allocation being distributed across the United States, is sourced from the 2022 federal Inflation Reduction Act’s Climate Pollution Reduction Grant program. SBN Detroit interviewed Joel Howrani Heeres, director of community resilience at Public Sector Consultants, who also was Detroit’s first sustainability director, for his thoughts regarding how the money should and will be spent, potential challenges, geographical impact, and other topics. Q: Michigan recently received $129 million in federal funding to advance large wind and solar projects. How do you see it being allocated and what are the biggest priorities to address in terms of large wind and solar? A: I think that the state is rightfully deploying this money to help incentivize local governments to permit solar and wind projects within their boundaries. We have a very aggressive goal to achieve as a state – 60% renewable energy by 2030. The funds provide a significant incentive for communities to host renewable energy infrastructure, offering up to $5,000 per megawatt. Rural areas often lack the resources and personnel needed to review permits and manage other aspects of developing this infrastructure. This financial support will be instrumental in helping these communities navigate the complexities involved in such projects. Q: The funding comes from the Federal Climate Pollution Reduction Grants (CPRG) program, created by the Inflation Reduction Act. Can you tell us more about this and its specific influence in Michigan? A: The CPRG is one of the first grant programs to enable both planning and implementation to address climate change. There is funding allocated for metropolitan areas above a certain size. To me, this regional approach makes a lot of sense. Emissions don’t stop at city boundaries. For example, there are many heavy industries on the Detroit/Melvindale border that impact that whole area and beyond. Taking a regional approach and also statewide grants have been used to help EGLE do their planning as well. I was disappointed to see that Michigan’s metro areas did not get implementation money from this grant, but accelerating renewables throughout the state is important. Q: What are the challenges that come with such large-scale complex projects in Michigan? A: First, local permitting and project development. The amount of land required for renewable energy installations presents another challenge, especially in rural areas where agricultural land is at a premium. Convincing these communities to accept large renewable installations, particularly when the power generated is likely to be consumed elsewhere, can be difficult. Discussing the benefits and costs of hosting these installations has become a political issue. Communities want to see tangible benefits and are reluctant to give up their land without adequate compensation. Thus, providing financial incentives to these communities could be an effective approach. Another important consideration is determining, from a grid perspective, the most strategic locations to connect these large installations to ensure efficient power transmission. Q: Is there a long runway with projects like this from an execution and timeline standpoint? A: Yes, there is. The process from conceptualization to actual ground-breaking involves numerous steps. This includes navigating the political landscape, such as public hearings and potential opposition. Additionally, there are essential stages like securing permits and installing infrastructure. Each of these components requires considerable time and careful planning. Q: Is there a geographical component? What areas of Michigan will be most impacted? A: Rural areas will be impacted the most. Beyond that, I don’t think there will be geographic concentration, I think it will spread across the state. Q: Do you foresee local opposition from Michiganders regarding these projects, and, if so, what are your thoughts on how to address this? A: Yes. Just the other day I was driving through Washtenaw County and saw signs that read “No Industrial Solar.” The focus returns to the tangible benefits of these installations. It is essential for people to see clear advantages. For instance, if a local government receives $5,000 per megawatt to enhance local services — funds that would not have been available otherwise — it can help alleviate some of the opposition to these projects. This financial support can be directed toward improving community services, thereby showcasing the positive community benefits of the installations. Q: Federal money will also flow to workforce development programs. What are your thoughts on how these projects may boost the economy and put people in jobs? A: It’s a crucial aspect of our current situation. We are undergoing a significant energy transition, shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, which represents a fundamentally different model. This transition requires Michiganders to acquire new skills to compete in the emerging green economy. Additionally, we’re moving toward the electrification of everything. By producing clean energy, we can electrify our homes, cars, and various aspects of our lives, as it all comes from a sustainable source. There is a critical need to retrain workers from the fossil fuel sector to participate in the electrified economy. Significant investments are being made in this area. Ultimately, this is a comprehensive ecosystem, and these changes will impact labor across all sectors. Q: What other ancillary benefits can we expect to accompany the execution of these projects? A: As we transition more of the energy load to cleaner technology, we’ll have less localized pollution, leading to statewide public health benefits. Additionally, there’s a significant potential for economic development. Michigan stands out as one of the most proactive states in terms of climate ambitions, which could attract industries seeking to operate on green power. Whether it’s tech companies, manufacturing firms, or other businesses, the state’s commitment to sustainability
EV Infrastructure Has Funding – When Will There Be Stations?
Three years ago, under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Congress allocated $5 billion in federal funding to establish the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Program. This initiative aims to develop charger networks across each state to support electric vehicles (EVs). Of this funding, $110 million was earmarked for Michigan, covering the period through fiscal year 2026. However, the state has not yet seen the installation of any new power stations. As part of this effort, Red E Charging LLC – an EV infrastructure developer and charging network based in Detroit – has been awarded several NEVI contracts to install and manage in Michigan and a number of other states. SBN Detroit interviewed Red E Charging Founder Abass El-Hage about the timeline, barriers, and factors specific to Michigan regarding power station installation. Q: Since the announcement in 2021 of the $5 billion in federal funding just 11 EV stations have been installed across seven states, with none in Michigan to date. From your perspective, why is this? A: There are several reasons. First, this is a new process and it took time to get organized, generate RFPs, and kick it off. RFPs were published at the end of last year and contracts were awarded early this year. Setting up the necessary paperwork is tedious and time-consuming, and around public funds, there is just a lot of due diligence required. There are also multiple and varied requirements around bonding that can take another six months to sort out. Identifying appropriate locations for the charging stations with the right amenities on the property that’s willing to host can be time-consuming. On top of that, regardless of how long the paperwork takes, working with the utilities and getting the right equipment and resources in place can take six months to a year. It’s simply an arduous process that takes time. Q: Do the requirements vary from state to state? A: Yes. Every state is different when it comes to execution under NEVI. In Texas and New Mexico, the NEVI process is pretty straightforward, but Texas has issues with utilities that can slow things down. I would say Michigan is the middle of the road. And the biggest hurdle here is the strict bonding requirements. Not every state requires bonding, but Michigan requires a five-year bond that’s not run of the mill. Q: Outside of NEVI projects, is every state different? A: Yes. Incentives are different in every state. Utilities are different. In Michigan, we are lucky to have DTE and Consumers Energy. They have been helpful and proactive, and they facilitate a lot. EGLE (Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy) and the EPA have been helpful in Michigan as well, helping to create infrastructure in off-highway locations that are still easily accessible at reasonable rates. Q: In Michigan, are the challenges different in the Upper Peninsula compared with the Lower Peninsula? A: Yes. With every project there are financials, and in the UP there are fewer people, there is less traffic, and therefore less charger usage. It’s harder to justify a project when you don’t make the money back as fast. Additionally, utilities in the Upper Peninsula impose demand charges, which are flat fees added to the electric bill. These charges can be quite substantial. When considering these costs, the financial viability of a project often becomes questionable. Q: How do you view the transition from gas to electric vehicles being understood and received by the public? A: It’s a mixed bag. I think there is still a stigma around charging and how difficult and inconvenient it could be. It’s a misconception in my opinion. I drive from Detroit to Chicago regularly and along that route, I can stop to charge just like stopping for gas. Also, I think there’s been mixed messaging to the public by the auto industry – especially here in Detroit. When there are recalls, or if an automaker commits to building x amount of EVs and then scales back, this sends mixed signals to the public. Q: How many contracts in Michigan has Red E Charging been awarded and what is the status? A: We’ve been awarded 12 NEVI contracts all over the state and an additional 60 fast charger projects across the state for EGLE and utilities. As I explained, the paperwork along with bonding requirements plus environmental approvals, site checks, and more make this a slow process. But we have notice to proceed and are moving forward with the first few now, so these will be underway. The actual installation takes just about two weeks. We were also awarded a project outside of NEVI with the City of Detroit to install public-facing chargers throughout the city. Q: Michigan aims to have enough infrastructure for 2 million EVs on the roads by 2030. Do you think this is possible? A: Yes, I think it can happen. DTE and Consumers Energy are very helpful when it comes to single-family and multifamily homes. It’s cost-effective to have a charger at your home. That drive from Chicago to Detroit I talked about … I think by the end of the year there will be chargers every 20 miles or so, eliminating any planning needed because people will feel confident they can stop whenever they need a charge. I think in the near future the logistics involved in an EV experience will be no different than driving a gas-powered vehicle. It’s just a different thing fueling the car. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
