Building with Purpose
MassTimber@MSU is a cross-disciplinary initiative at Michigan State University dedicated to advancing mass timber construction and manufacturing in Michigan. Collaborating with partners across construction, forestry, development, and state agencies—including the Michigan Department of Natural Resources—the initiative leverages MSU’s land-grant mission through research, teaching, stakeholder engagement, and policy development to build a sustainable mass timber future for the state. SBN Detroit interviewed Sandra Lupien, Director of MassTimber@MSU, about the environmental, economic, and design implications of mass timber and the growing momentum behind the material in Michigan and beyond. Q: What is the MassTimber@MSU initiative, and what inspired its creation? A: MassTimber@MSU is a collaboration across MSU’s School of Planning, Design and Construction, Department of Forestry, and MSU Extension. We work with partners across the state—including construction professionals, foresters, community and development organizations, and state agencies like the Michigan Department of Natural Resources—to advance mass timber construction and manufacturing in Michigan. Our approach reflects MSU’s land-grant mission: research, teaching and curriculum development, stakeholder engagement, and policy exploration that could support mass timber adoption. Since I started in this role in July 2021, momentum is growing. There are now more than 65 mass timber projects in the pipeline in Michigan. The STEM Teaching and Learning Facility on MSU’s campus, which is the second building in the state to use cross-laminated timber (CLT), helped demonstrate what’s possible. And we’re now seeing serious interest from prospective producers who are looking to locate in Michigan. Q: What are the environmental benefits of mass timber in terms of sustainability, carbon reduction, and climate resilience? A: This is exactly what drew me to mass timber. It’s a tool in our toolkit to reduce carbon emissions, support sustainable communities, and help foster healthier, more resilient forests. Globally, the built environment accounts for about 39% of greenhouse gas emissions—28% from building operations and 11% from construction materials like concrete, steel, and glass. These materials are essential, but they’re energy-intensive to produce. Wood, by contrast, is a renewable resource that stores carbon. When we use wood in construction, we’re not only lowering a building’s embodied carbon footprint—we’re also locking that carbon into the structure itself. At MSU, the STEM Teaching and Learning Facility contains roughly 3,000 cubic meters of mass timber, which stores about 1,856 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. That’s comparable to removing the emissions from 4 million miles driven by an average car. Mass timber buildings, in this way, become carbon storage banks. On the forestry side, we know that many forests evolved with low-intensity natural fires that helped maintain healthy densities. Today, many of our forests are overcrowded, which makes them vulnerable to pests, disease, and catastrophic wildfire. Because of past logging practices and fire suppression, we have an obligation—and opportunity—to steward forests more sustainably. When we do that, we can produce wood that extends the climate benefits of trees, especially if that wood would otherwise decay or burn. Q: How are MSU students and faculty engaging with mass timber—from design to research to real-world application? A: There are three main academic areas deeply engaged with mass timber: Construction Management, Forestry and Biochemistry, and Civil and Environmental Engineering. We have undergraduates, master’s students, and Ph.D. candidates working with faculty on projects across those disciplines. In Construction Management, Professor George Berghorn is developing mass timber curriculum modules that can be used nationally in engineering and construction programs. In Forestry, Professor Mojgan Nejad is doing incredible work on developing bio-based adhesives and coatings for use in mass timber—replacing fossil-fuel-based polyurethane with lignin-based alternatives. She’s actively working toward commercialization. We’ve also done economic research to analyze supply chains and survey demand, which helps inform developers and policymakers. And beginning Spring 2025, we launched a new course focused entirely on mass timber, led by Dr. George Berghorn and tailored for both undergraduate and graduate students. Q: From an economic perspective, how could mass timber help revitalize Michigan’s forestry sector and rural economies? A: We’ve modeled the economic impacts of launching a 50,000-cubic-meter-per-year mass timber manufacturing facility in Michigan. The results are exciting: such a facility would contribute $152 million to the state’s GDP and support 318 jobs. There’s a strong need to find new uses for Michigan wood. With the paper industry in decline and other traditional markets shifting, mass timber presents an opportunity to create high-value products that support Michigan jobs and rural economies. Q: How does the initiative align with Michigan’s climate goals or sustainable development strategies statewide? A: The MI Healthy Climate Plan, which outlines the state’s climate goals, directly mentions mass timber three times—as a key strategy for reducing emissions in the built environment and managing natural lands sustainably. The City of Lansing’s Sustainability Action Plan also highlights mass timber, and East Lansing has even amended its zoning ordinance to incentivize developers to use mass timber and build LEED-certified projects. It’s encouraging to see this kind of policy support—it sends a signal that mass timber can and should be part of Michigan’s climate solution. Q: What does Michigan’s existing forest resource look like, and how does sustainable forestry tie into your vision? A: Healthy, resilient forests are the foundation of everything we do. In Michigan, about 70% of our forest resource is hardwood and 30% is softwood. Most mass timber products currently certified for use in the U.S. are made from softwoods. That said, Michigan does have suitable softwood species. For example, red pine was certified for structural use because the Michigan DNR prioritized using Michigan wood in a customer service building in the Upper Peninsula. That’s a great example of state leadership driving local wood utilization. As the industry evolves, there’s potential to expand the species we can use in mass timber production. Q: Looking ahead five to ten years, what’s your boldest vision for the impact of the Mass Timber Initiative? A: I’d like to see commercial buildings—everything from multifamily housing to community centers to industrial facilities—considering mass timber from the outset, not as a novelty but as a viable, mainstream option. Mass timber
Identifying Opportunities for Improved Efficiencies
The Energy Alliance Group of North America focuses on helping businesses implement sustainable energy solutions by identifying opportunities for improved efficiency and connecting clients to funding and technology. Based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the company collaborates with commercial and industrial property managers to reduce energy consumption, enhance operations, and achieve long-term cost savings. SBN Detroit interviewed Scott Ringlein, founder, principal, and Chief Strategy Officer, about energy efficiency in Southeast Michigan, the role of financing and audits, and the importance of long-term thinking when it comes to sustainability. Q: What are the biggest energy efficiency challenges facing commercial and industrial buildings in Southeast Michigan? A: Misinformation is one of the biggest challenges. Every building has the opportunity to implement energy efficiency improvements, and there is money available to make it happen. These improvements offer a return on investment, but many building operators and owners either don’t believe the numbers or assume they don’t apply to them. The truth is, utility costs are ongoing and only getting higher, so the only way to gain control is to improve your building’s efficiency. Q: How can businesses identify when it’s time to upgrade or retrofit their energy systems A: Start by knowing what you have—what systems are in place, their expected lifespan, and their maintenance history. If you’re seeing frequent repairs and higher maintenance costs, it’s time to look at alternatives. Then evaluate how much more efficient a new system could be and what kind of energy savings it could deliver. If the numbers make sense, that’s the signal to move forward. Unfortunately, many businesses struggle with that last step—deciding to invest. Q: What misconceptions do you commonly encounter around cost recovery or energy savings? A: Many building owners don’t believe the projections—even when we show them data that supports a positive cash flow within one or two years. They tend to focus solely on ROI and forget that utilities never go away. You’re always going to pay for water, electricity, gas—whatever it is. And the utility companies have no vested interest in lowering your costs. So even if you’re skeptical, you’re still going to be paying more year after year unless you act. Q: How has the financing landscape changed for energy upgrades—especially for nonprofits or small businesses? A: We’ve been in this space since 2012, and the financing options today are better than they’ve ever been. Tax credits will come and go, but there are more long-term tools now than there were a decade ago. Michigan has been a leader in this area. Programs like Michigan Saves were the first of their kind in the U.S. We’re also a state approved for Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing, although it’s underutilized here compared to states like California. Still, the options are out there—you have choices, and you can take control. Q: What role do energy audits play in long-term planning, and how often should they be conducted? A: Audits are essential. You need to know where you stand—what equipment you have, how efficient it is, and what condition it’s in. It’s surprising how many clients have never even been on their own roof, where all the major equipment is housed. There are different levels of audits. A Level 1 audit gives you a basic understanding of what you have and where you’re spending your money. A Level 3 audit goes deeper and is useful when you’re preparing to make major decisions—like process changes or equipment replacement. A challenge is that many companies don’t take the time for a comprehensive audit until it’s too late. Smaller organizations may lack the staff, and larger ones may lose visibility due to scale. But without that baseline, long-term planning is difficult. Q: How do Southeast Michigan’s climate swings shape energy strategy in the region? A: As an organization, we don’t use climate change as the primary argument for doing the right thing. Climate change is happening, but we believe the conversation around energy efficiency should be happening regardless. You’re spending money on utilities – and there are better systems and more efficient ways to operate. We also need to think long-term. In the U.S., we don’t treat these upgrades as long-term investments the way they do in Europe or Asia. There, the systems are central to the building’s value and are maintained accordingly. Here, we often focus too much on short-term costs instead of building for performance and sustainability. Q: What advice do you have for businesses looking to reduce costs and improve operations going forward? A: Real-time monitoring of building systems from a central location gives you visibility and control. Beyond that, the cost of implementing technologies like LED lighting, heat pumps, solar panels, and combined heat and power (CHP) systems has become very feasible. There are also integrated systems now—solar light poles with battery storage and surveillance, for example—that operate independently of utility companies. The key is maintenance. These systems don’t last forever if they’re neglected. But with built-in monitoring and upkeep, they can be powerful tools for cutting costs and improving resilience. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Sustainability in Practice at the Detroit VA
The Detroit VA Healthcare System is implementing a systemwide sustainability strategy through its Green Environmental Management System (GEMS), designed to reduce waste, lower energy consumption, and improve operational efficiency. The program recently earned Practice Greenhealth’s “Top 25 Environmental Excellence Award.” Through coordinated efforts across departments and a commitment to innovation—particularly in high-resource areas like dialysis—the Detroit VA works to demonstrate how environmental stewardship and clinical care can go hand in hand. SBN Detroit interviewed Andrew Deppner, clinical nurse manager of the hemodialysis unit at the Detroit VA, to learn more about the system’s approach and what other healthcare institutions can adopt from their progress. Q: Why do you think sustainability is such a crucial part of healthcare today? A: Sustainability is relevant to all human operations today—we’re working with finite resources, and being good stewards of those resources is imperative. That’s especially true in healthcare. The population is aging, and we’re seeing more people living longer with chronic health needs. Meanwhile, healthcare itself is becoming more expensive. That means we need to be smarter about how we allocate and use resources. At the VA, we serve 9 million–10 million veterans every year with a workforce of nearly half a million staff members. The sheer scale of our operations means our environmental footprint is significant. So our responsibility is twofold: Providing top-tier care and managing the institution in a way that honors that care through sustainability. Q: Walk me through the structure of the GEMS program. How do departments collaborate to implement sustainability initiatives across such a large system? A: GEMS operates as a committee that meets quarterly to evaluate all relevant projects—whether it’s new construction, repairs, upgrades, or procedural changes. One of our key parameters for approval is sustainability. We always ask: Can this process or improvement be made more sustainable? We also assess best practices across the larger VA health system and use that insight to inform local decisions. That structure allows us to prioritize environmental responsibility across the board while tailoring solutions to our specific needs. Q: In terms of winning Practice Greenhealth’s Top 25 Environmental Excellence Award, what do you think sets the Detroit VA apart, and what might others learn from your example? A: Honestly, it comes down to our scale and our passion. We deliver a huge volume of patient care, so the impact of our sustainability efforts is magnified. But what truly sets us apart is that our team is fully committed. Stewardship isn’t just an initiative here—it’s a value we live by. That passion influences every decision we make, and it shows up in the way we approach both large-scale projects and day-to-day operations. If there’s one thing other systems can take away, it’s that passion drives results. When your team is genuinely invested in sustainability, it shows up in your outcomes. Q: How did your team reimagine the system to reverse the traditional water-use ratio in dialysis—and are other departments applying this kind of thinking? A: Traditionally, reverse osmosis (RO) systems in dialysis operate with significant water waste, which is 60% to 80% efficient. We are working at about 98% efficiency. We achieved this by choosing a high-recovery RO system over a standard one. That decision alone results in millions of gallons of water saved each year. When we received quotes from vendors, we made high-recovery RO our top priority, even though it required more investment and more work on our end. We believed it was worth it, and our team embraced the challenge. Q: What were some of the biggest challenges you encountered when trying to drive sustainability in a healthcare setting, and how did you overcome them? A: One challenge was our water room construction project. We decided to partner with a smaller, less globally established engineering company. That meant we had to take on a larger share of the planning and preparation ourselves. The tradeoff was that we had more control over the sustainability aspects of the project, but it also required more time and resources. Despite the extra effort — more vendor coordination, more problem-solving — it paid off. We now have a highly efficient system that we believe in. It was more work, but we were willing to do it because the outcome aligned with our values. Q: How does the Detroit VA balance sustainability with the demands of clinical care, especially in high-intensity or resource-heavy departments? A: It starts with commitment. Everyone on our team is dedicated to serving our veterans. That shared purpose enables us to pursue ambitious projects without compromising care. I’ve been able to focus on our sustainability efforts because I trust my clinical team implicitly. Their professionalism and passion have freed me to work on these broader initiatives, and I know the patient care side is in excellent hands. Q: If you could share one key takeaway or piece of advice with other healthcare systems looking to follow your lead, what would it be? A: Plan ahead. You can’t foresee every variable, but the more proactive you are, the better your outcomes will be. Anticipate your resource needs early and map out the process thoroughly. If you do that, you’ll be in a stronger position to allocate budget and support before problems arise. Sustainability is about systems thinking, and that starts with good planning. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Reimagining the Pallet Supply Chain
Founded in Michigan, 3R Pallets is working to transform what can be an environmentally costly component of global logistics: the shipping pallet. The company creates reusable composite pallets made with recycled plastics and reclaimed plant fibers, designed to reduce waste and extend product lifespan, offering a scalable alternative to traditional wood and plastic models. SBN Detroit interviewed co-founder Kylee Guenther about innovation in the pallet industry, the environmental consequences, and the outlook for Southeast Michigan and beyond. Q: What was the impetus behind founding 3R Pallets? A: I’m the second-generation in my family to work in Michigan’s plastics industry—I literally grew up on the shop floor, learning from the bottom up. My dad worked on everything from one-gallon milk bottles to those little lemon-shaped juice containers. I was always fascinated by the engineering, but I was also concerned by the amount of waste I saw. As an adult, I became more focused on sustainability and how I could be part of the solution, so I decided to do something about it. That’s how 3R Pallets was born. Our goal is to disrupt the archaic wooden shipping pallet industry with the world’s most sustainable pallets. Not only are our pallets sustainable, but we help save our customers money. Traditional pallets damage and destroy product, cause production downtimes and need constant repair and endless reordering. With our drop in solution, we’re disrupting this space. We just graduated from TechStars and are the first company from Lansing to ever be accepted. It’s one of the most competitive and respected accelerators in the country. We’re also currently raising a $1.2 million pre-seed round to help onboard new customers, build inventory, and grow our team. Q: What do most people misunderstand about the scale and impact of pallet production? A: People just don’t think about them. Pallets are invisible to most consumers. They’re not something you interact with every day, so it’s hard to grasp the scale unless you’ve worked in logistics or manufacturing. Compare that to straws, bags, or plastic bottles—people have firsthand experience with those, so there’s a clear sense of impact. But over 90% of the goods we use were shipped on a pallet at some point. It’s a massive part of the supply chain that’s often overlooked. Q: With pallet use expected to increase in the next decade due to e-commerce growth, what are the biggest sustainability challenges facing the industry today? A: The first big challenge is access to materials. We’re already seeing lumber shortages in many places, and if demand doubles, costs will rise, and pressure on forests will increase. We can’t pretend there’s an endless supply of trees to meet that need. Plastic pallets are often seen as an alternative, but not all plastics can be used in pallet manufacturing. And recycling plastic isn’t a forever solution—it degrades over time. Our approach uses recycled plastic and reclaimed bamboo fibers which actually strengthens the material and increases how many times it can be reused or recycled. Q: Most wooden pallets are only used a few times before being discarded. Why has reuse or recycling been such a persistent challenge? A: The main issue is durability. Wooden pallets simply aren’t built to last. They break down after a few uses, especially when hit by forklifts or exposed to the elements. And if they’ve been fumigated, they often can’t be recycled at all. Our composite pallets can be used 50 to 60 times. They won’t degrade like wooden pallets and can be repaired or recycled when necessary. That’s a huge improvement in terms of both cost and environmental impact. Q: What is the typical lifecycle of a pallet from production to landfill, and where are the biggest environmental pain points? A: For wood, a tree is grown, cut down, milled, and nailed into a pallet. It’s sent to a distributor, then to a customer, used a few times, and if it’s damaged or treated, it goes to a landfill. Best case scenario is they enter a secondary market after being repaired and get a couple more uses. Plastic pallets are usually injection molded, often using virgin plastic. They might last for 30 to 40 cycles, then either get recycled or landfilled depending on their condition. Our pallets are different. They’re made with non-edible plant fibers with recycled plastic and molded into a durable product. They can go through 50 to 60 uses, and in many cases can be repaired or recycled again. That means fewer pallets are needed overall—and far fewer are discarded. Q: How does Michigan contribute to or feel the impacts of pallet consumption? A: We use a lot of pallets here—there’s no doubt about that. But Michigan also gives us a big opportunity because the automotive industry is one of the most forward-thinking when it comes to closed loopy supply chains. We’re already seeing traction in that space. Our value proposition is simple: help customers ship more goods with fewer pallets. That’s good for business and good for the planet. Q: How does the end-of-life of a pallet impact the total carbon footprint of a shipping operation? A: It’s huge. Most traditional wood or plastic pallets end up in landfills and producing new ones requires more energy and raw materials. That adds up. If you extend the life of a pallet and reduce the number of replacements needed, you lower emissions, reduce waste, and conserve resources. Our composite pallets are designed to be durable and recyclable, which makes the whole system more sustainable from start to finish. Q: What has innovation been like in the pallet industry? A: There truly hasn’t been a lot of innovation. Most of it is on the software side but the heart of shipping is still the pallet. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Designing for the Future: How HED Approaches Sustainable, Integrated Design Delivery
HED is an integrated design, architecture, and engineering company founded in Detroit with a Royal Oak office and a national presence, dedicated to designing high-performing, sustainable spaces that enhance lives and strengthen communities. The firm collaborates with both public and private clients to address the complex challenges of decarbonization and climate resilience. SBN Detroit interviewed Daniel Jaconetti, National Sustainable Design Leader, and Thomas Hoff, Mechanical Engineering and Sustainable Design Leader, to explore the realities of achieving net zero, what clients are prioritizing in Southeast Michigan, and where sustainability efforts must go next. Q: As we approach 2030, how realistic is the industry-wide goal of achieving net-zero operational and embodied carbon in buildings, and where are the biggest gaps today? Jaconetti: Whether or not it’s “realistic” is beside the point; the goal is what is necessary. Scientists have defined what the atmosphere can tolerate, and we’re working backwards from there. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) has set a target of net zero energy (operational greenhouse gas emissions or “carbon”) by 2030 and net zero embodied carbon by 2050. That first part — net zero energy — is readily achievable for many, if not all. However, 2030 is less than five years away, and even if we think we may fall short, we can’t take our foot off the accelerator. One of the biggest gaps right now is energy modeling. We have the tools, but too often, energy modeling is done late in the design process. If we model earlier, we can make smarter decisions upfront, decisions that shape a building’s performance for decades. Q: What trends or client demands are driving sustainability in architecture and engineering, especially in Michigan? Hoff: The most immediate driver is cost. More efficient buildings are simply cheaper to operate and easier to manage, especially when extreme weather hits. Energy efficiency and resilience go hand in hand, and that’s an easy sell. We’re also seeing more clients who want to lead by example. They’re not just aiming for code minimum; they have their own climate goals and want to build high-performance environments that align with their values. Those are fantastic clients to work with because they’re already motivated and looking to push the envelope. Q: What are the most common challenges you face when trying to decarbonize a project? Jaconetti: The biggest challenge is often understanding. There are still knowledge gaps in what “decarbonization” actually means. Sometimes clients — even large manufacturers — are under pressure from global partners to “decarbonize” but don’t know what that entails. So, we start by educating and aligning on definitions. Another issue is that the term “net zero” itself has been made confusing, sometimes defined as just being better than a baseline. That muddies the water. Let’s be honest and consistent about what we’re doing and why. This isn’t a branding exercise. It’s an existential issue for humanity. Q: How do you communicate the long-term value or ROI of sustainable design to clients focused on short-term costs? Hoff: Energy modeling is key. We can take a theoretical building and compare design options, showing exactly how much money (and energy / GHG emissions) a client might save over 5 or 10 years. It’s about shifting the conversation from low first cost to lifecycle cost (or total cost of ownership). When we model early in the design process, we can shape the building to hit more favorable payback windows and improve ROI. In most cases, you spend a little more up front and gain a lot more over the long haul. Q: Can you share a recent Michigan project that exemplifies sustainability, and what made it successful? Hoff: One great example is the renovation and addition of the Alexander G. Ruthven Building at the University of Michigan. The original building was an old museum — architecturally iconic, but outdated and inefficient. We helped transform it into a modern administrative and classroom facility, incorporating chilled beams, a VAV hot water system, and high-performance design throughout. It’s now LEED BD+C NC V4 Gold certified. Even more important: we took a forward-thinking approach to the campus’s future. Although we needed to connect to U-M’s central steam plant in the near term, we designed the systems to be able to evolve into a more efficient central hot water system in the future, to align with their long-term sustainability goals. That kind of systemic thinking is what helps make a project truly sustainable. Q: How do public vs. private sector clients approach sustainability, and how does that play out in Southeast Michigan? Jaconetti: In our experience, both sectors are committed, but the way they document and communicate that commitment can differ. Public clients are often more visible and accountable to constituents, so there’s a strong emphasis on modeling, metrics, and transparency. Private clients, especially those with ESG reporting obligations or international affiliations, can be just as rigorous. What varies most is the degree of certification or formal documentation they pursue. Hoff: In the public sector, particularly with projects like laboratories or civic buildings, the long-term horizon is often more accepted. These clients understand that resilient design can mean lower operating costs over decades — and that aligns well with public funding structures. Q: What role does retrofitting existing buildings play in decarbonization, and how does that differ from new construction? Jaconetti: As architects, we love the blank slate of new construction — it allows us to optimize everything. But the most sustainable building is often the one that already exists. About 50% of a building’s embodied carbon is in the structure. If we can reuse that structure, we’ve already made major progress. That said, we must evaluate trade-offs carefully. Upgrading systems to all-electric, for example, might not make sense if the embodied carbon of those new systems outweighs the operational benefits. Every retrofit has different variables, it’s a nuanced equation, and we have to be honest about the priorities and data behind our decisions. Q: What technologies, policies, or behaviors will be most important in accelerating
Guiding Michigan Businesses Toward Smarter Climate Action
Fresh Coast Climate Solutions is a Michigan-based climate consultancy that aims to help organizations across sectors implement sustainable, equitable, and economically viable climate strategies. Founded on deep expertise in greenhouse gas inventories, carbon mitigation, ESG, water stewardship, and circular economy principles, the company provides technical support and strategic guidance to businesses and municipalities navigating the energy transition. Fresh Coast has partnered on projects ranging from municipal benchmarking in Flint to advanced battery development in collaboration with American Battery Solutions. SBN Detroit interviewed Jenny Oorbeck and Josh Brugeman, co-founders of Fresh Coast Climate Solutions, to discuss the company’s current priorities, lessons from its recent projects, and how small and mid-sized businesses can build effective climate strategies in a fast-changing policy and economic landscape. Q: What is the impetus behind Fresh Coast Climate Solutions? Oorbeck: We launched Fresh Coast three years ago with a sense of urgency. The climate crisis felt personal and immediate, and we wanted to take the reins into our own hands. From the beginning, we focused on building a company culture grounded in bold, transformative action. That means not being afraid to push boundaries, not say no to pilot projects, and work only with partners who share our ambition and urgency. Our goal has always been impact at scale, not incrementalism. Brugeman: We’re very deliberate about engaging in projects that move the needle. That includes deploying transformative technologies, piloting new programmatic approaches, and pursuing strategies that can meaningfully shift the trajectory of climate and sustainability efforts. We’re not interested in business-as-usual—we want to help organizations lead. Q: What are the most common climate-related challenges businesses in Southeast Michigan are facing right now? Oorbeck: We’re seeing a consistent challenge among small and mid-sized enterprises. Many are under pressure—from customers, employees, and supply chain partners—to demonstrate meaningful climate action. But they often lack the bandwidth, technical knowledge, or financial resources to respond effectively. New regulations, evolving standards, and growing stakeholder expectations can feel overwhelming. They need help making informed, strategic, decisions that advance both their sustainability and competitiveness. Brugeman: For many of these companies, sustainability is becoming a prerequisite for doing business, especially if they’re part of larger supply chains. Increasingly, their clients are demanding emissions data, decarbonization strategies, and ESG transparency. The risk is real: Suppliers that don’t adapt could lose out on future contracts. That’s why we emphasize not only environmental stewardship, but also economic competitiveness and operational resilience – things like reducing energy costs or preparing for power disruptions and extreme weather events. Q: Once businesses are ready to act, what barriers tend to prevent meaningful progress? Oorbeck: The most common barriers are capacity and resources. In smaller organizations, sustainability is often an added responsibility for someone already juggling multiple roles. Without a dedicated team or financial backing, the work can stall. That’s why our Michigan Climate Wise Business Program—funded by the Erb Family Foundation—focuses specifically on helping these under-resourced companies move forward. We provide access to expert guidance so they can prioritize and implement practical solutions. Brugeman: I’d also highlight two major gaps: technical expertise and access to capital. Many businesses know sustainability is important, but they don’t know where to start. That’s where engaging external experts can make a difference. We encourage companies to look for “no-regrets” projects—efforts that cut emissions, save money, improve efficiency, and position them for future success. Q: Are there misconceptions you regularly encounter when it comes to emissions, ESG, or water stewardship? Brugeman: One of the biggest misconceptions is around timelines. Many leaders focus solely on short-term paybacks, but climate action is a long game. Sustainability isn’t just a “nice to have”—in larger organizations, it’s already embedded into operations, tied to financial incentives, and closely monitored at the executive level. Smaller companies don’t always realize how deeply integrated these issues have become, and that disconnect can be costly. Oorbeck: Agreed. Another misconception is that the pressure to act will fade, or that a few small gestures are enough. The reality is that some companies risk being dropped as suppliers if they can’t demonstrate credible sustainability progress. We need to move the conversation beyond quarterly goals and toward long-term impact. This is the defining business challenge of our time. Q: How does Michigan’s regional identity shape the way companies need to approach sustainability? Brugeman: Michigan has a unique responsibility and opportunity. We sit at the center of the largest freshwater system on the planet—yet we undervalue and underprotect this critical resource. Water stewardship should be a defining focus for our region. We also have deep roots in heavy manufacturing, which has been the economic backbone of the state. As the global economy shifts toward decarbonization, Michigan is positioned to lead—but only if we commit to building a cleaner, more sustainable industrial base. We’ve excelled at making things. Now we need to excel at making them responsibly. Q: You’ve worked with municipal governments on decarbonization strategies. What can businesses learn from those efforts? Oorbeck: I started my career in the public sector, and at times cities have led the way in sustainability, especially when support at the state or federal level has wavered. Cities began developing climate action plans more than two decades ago. Businesses can learn from those experiences: how to build internal teams, engage stakeholders, and set meaningful targets. At the same time, municipalities can learn from the agility of the private sector, especially in deploying solutions quickly. Brugeman: One thing the public sector does well is plan for the long term. That mindset is essential for climate action. Conversely, the private sector often moves faster and embraces innovation more readily. If each sector borrows from the other, we can accelerate progress. Q: What recent projects are you especially proud of and what lessons might they offer to other Michigan businesses? Brugeman: One is our Michigan Climate Wise Business Program. In partnership with Centrepolis Accelerator and supported by the Erb Family Foundation, we provide sustainability and climate services to small and mid-sized businesses that lack the internal capacity to
Remora’s Carbon Capture Technology Targets Heavy-Duty Transportation
Founded in 2020 and based in Wixom, Michigan, Remora is developing a carbon capture device designed to attach directly to semi-trucks and locomotives and collect emissions. The captured carbon dioxide is then sold to end-users, creating a potential revenue stream for fleet operators and rail companies while reducing their environmental impact. The company has raised more than $100 million in venture capital. SBN Detroit interviewed Paul Gross, co-founder and CEO of Remora, about the company’s current stage of development, the challenges of scaling climate technology, and what it takes to commercialize clean transportation solutions from Southeast Michigan. Q: You’ve raised more than $100 million in venture funding. Who’s backing Remora, and what does that support enable? A: We’ve raised $117 million to date across several funding rounds. Our latest round was led by Valor Equity Partners – they were one of the first institutional investors in Tesla, so we’re fortunate to have that kind of backing and belief in what we’re building. Other key investors include Lowercarbon Capital and First Round Capital. This kind of support has allowed us to invest in R&D and begin to partner with some of the biggest transportation companies in the world. Q: To that end, Remora has drawn interest from companies like Union Pacific, DHL, and Ryder. What does that level of engagement say about the industry’s readiness to adopt carbon capture technology, and how has it shaped your strategic approach? A: I’ve been amazed at how excited trucking and rail companies are about this technology. That level of interest tells me that the industry wants to act. They’re not just talking about sustainability – they’re ready to deploy solutions that make sense financially and operationally. That’s been the missing link. Our system retrofits onto existing vehicles, and it pays for itself by generating revenue from the captured CO₂. That’s what makes it viable for these companies to adopt at scale. Q: Where are you in terms of deployment and technology development? A: We built our first carbon capture system for semi-trucks a few years ago, and that prototype taught us a lot. Our second-generation system is now running with a truck engine and achieving 90% capture efficiency – which we consider a major milestone. We’ve partnered with fleets like Ryder, Estes, and Werner and are preparing for wider deployment. We’re also designing the system to be as compact and lightweight as possible to meet the operational needs of the industry. The scale of the opportunity is huge – there are about 2 million semi-trucks on the road in the U.S., emitting around 350 million tons of CO₂ per year. On the locomotive side, we’re developing the world’s first carbon capture system for trains and testing it right now in Wixom. We’ll begin field deployment with Union Pacific next year. Q: Remora’s approach stands out because it generates revenue through carbon capture resale. How do you see this model evolving as more companies adopt decarbonization strategies? A: There’s already significant demand for CO₂ in the U.S. – around 75 million tons are used every year, and that demand is growing. Industries like food and beverage, wastewater treatment, and sustainable aviation fuel use it, but not to scale. We’re seeing CO₂ being converted into things like hand sanitizer and laundry detergent. So, we’re capturing a waste stream and turning it into a revenue stream. In addition to selling CO₂, we also plan to sequester it underground using EPA-certified wells. There are federal tax credits supporting this, originally passed under the Obama administration and expanded under both Trump and Biden. So, whether through resale or sequestration, we have strong pathways to scale. Q: What are the biggest barriers to broader deployment? A: The biggest challenge right now is manufacturing at scale. This is the first carbon capture system ever built for a locomotive, and there’s no existing supply chain. We’re building it from the ground up, and we’re doing it mostly here in the U.S. So, the focus now is on industrializing our manufacturing process so that we can produce systems quickly, cost-effectively, and at high quality. That’s essential if we’re going to deploy these systems at the speed the climate crisis demands. Q: What advice do you have for other cleantech startups in Southeast Michigan or beyond? A: One lesson is that it’s important to demonstrate commercial demand early. A lot of engineers and scientists are working on technology solutions in this sector, but you have to make sure you’re solving a real problem that your customer has. We started talking to trucking companies on day one, even before we had a working prototype. Getting feedback early helped us design a system that met their needs, worked within their operations, and made financial sense. That kind of customer co-design has been huge for us. Q: What metrics do you track to measure impact? A: We focus on three key indicators: capture efficiency, product purity, and energy use. Capture efficiency tells us what percentage of CO₂ the system is capturing, as I said, we’re at 90% on our latest truck engine tests. Product purity matters because a lot of our CO₂ is going to sectors that need high-purity gas, like food and beverage. Energy use is the third metric. Carbon capture is inherently energy-intensive, and we’re working constantly to improve our efficiency. If the system draws too much energy, it’s not practical – so that’s a top focus for us. Q: Looking ahead, how do you see Remora’s technology integrating with broader trends in transportation, such as fleet electrification, hydrogen fuel, or grid decarbonization? A: Our technology is best suited for heavy-duty, long-haul vehicles — the sector that’s hardest to decarbonize. Electrifying a locomotive, for example, would require about 750 Tesla batteries. Building overhead electrical lines for freight rail would cost over a trillion dollars. And hydrogen still faces a lot of technical and infrastructure challenges. Within this sector, we can retrofit existing vehicles and make a meaningful dent in emissions while generating a return.
Natural Community Services Works to Reclaim Ecological Health in Southeast Michigan
Founded in 2009 and based in Northville, Natural Community Services provides ecological restoration and land stewardship services focused on native landscapes, habitat creation, and green infrastructure. The company works with municipalities, businesses, and nonprofit organizations across Michigan to implement science-based strategies aiming to improve ecological function and address long-term environmental concerns. SBN Detroit interviewed company cofounder Liz DeLisle and Senior Ecologist Nick Longbucco to gain insight into Southeast Michigan’s ecological challenges, how organizations are adapting their land-use practices, and what trends may shape local approaches to sustainability and restoration. Q: What inspired the creation of Natural Community Services, and what specific environmental problems were you aiming to address from the start? DeLisle: The company was founded to address growing ecological degradation in our region—things like habitat loss, urban heat islands, and unmanaged stormwater runoff. We wanted to bring attention to sustainable processes and increase education among both residents and businesses. From the beginning, we’ve been focused on designing landscapes with native plant species and building habitats for pollinators, while also encouraging community-led efforts to reconnect with and restore local ecosystems. Q: From your perspective, what are the biggest ecological challenges businesses and municipalities in Southeast Michigan are facing today? Longbucco: There are quite a few, but broadly speaking, climate change and urban sprawl are two of the most pressing. Southeast Michigan – from Detroit to Pontiac – is heavily built out, and impervious surfaces like concrete create major issues with stormwater management. Localized flooding has become a widespread concern, so implementing green stormwater infrastructure like bioretention systems and rain gardens is more important than ever. Habitat fragmentation is another challenge that often gets overlooked. As urban areas expand and natural spaces are divided, we’re seeing a rise in invasive species, along with increased pressure on the green spaces that remain. The need to protect, manage, and restore those spaces is absolutely critical. Q: How would you describe the current level of ecological literacy or awareness among business and civic leaders in Michigan? Longbucco: We’ve definitely seen growth, especially among municipalities, counties, and townships. Topics like sustainability, stormwater management, and climate adaptation are much more present in conversations now than they were a decade ago. Many of these public leaders are responding to increased interest and concern from their constituents. That said, a major gap still exists in understanding the long-term benefits and cost savings of sustainable practices. Too often, decision-makers see the upfront investment but don’t grasp the payoff that comes over time. DeLisle: Incentives can really help bridge that gap. Stormwater credits and grant funding have played an important role in encouraging businesses to explore green infrastructure. Once they see both the environmental and economic benefits, we’ve found they’re more likely to adopt and continue those practices. Q: What are the most persistent barriers that organizations face when trying to implement ecological or sustainable landscape projects? Longbucco: The biggest challenge is often a lack of funding, or even knowledge of where to look for it. Beyond that, many organizations simply don’t have in-house expertise. They may not know where to begin, how to design a project, or who to partner with. There are also regulatory hurdles. HOA rules or local ordinances may restrict things like alternative lawns or rain gardens. And from a process standpoint, getting landscape architects, civil engineers, and ecological planners to collaborate effectively can be tricky. Those groups often come from different perspectives, and aligning them early in the process is essential for successful outcomes. Q: Have you noticed any shifts in how businesses or public entities are thinking about land use, stormwater, habitat preservation, or native landscaping over the past decade? Longbucco: Absolutely. There’s been a major shift among public sector leaders, especially at the municipal level. As people in the community become more vocal about sustainability and green space, public entities are responding. There’s also been an increase in collaborative efforts – nonprofits, cities, and private organizations working together more fluidly than they used to. That’s been especially noticeable over the past five years. DeLisle: As public understanding grows, it has a ripple effect. People start asking their cities and local governments to make more sustainable choices, whether that’s through native plantings or more ecologically responsible land management strategies like prescribed burns. It’s about keeping the community happy while also doing what’s right for the land. Q: What issues or opportunities are particular to Southeast Michigan? Longbucco: Urban sprawl is definitely one of the biggest issues, along with aging infrastructure and climate change. Our region is located in a lake plain, which makes water drainage more challenging. That creates a major opportunity for green infrastructure to play a larger role in how we manage stormwater and climate impacts. There’s also a growing focus on environmental justice, ensuring that everyone has access to healthy green spaces. Both governments and businesses are starting to recognize that quality of life matters when it comes to attracting and retaining talent, and ecological stewardship plays a part in that. DeLisle: The lack of green space in industrial and urban areas is a big challenge, but it’s also an opportunity. With community engagement and the right investments, we can revitalize these areas through green initiatives that improve both ecology and public well-being. Q: Are there any recent success stories or surprising lessons you’ve seen emerge from local projects that could be instructive to others? Delisle: We’ve been fortunate to work on a number of successful public projects. Eliza Howell Park, Heritage Park in Farmington Hills, Normandy Oaks in Royal Oak, Legacy Park in Northville, and several parks for Wayne County and in Van Buren Township are great examples. In those areas, we’ve done everything from invasive species removal and native seedings to prescribed burns and long-term habitat management. One of the most exciting outcomes for these parks, as well as our Detroit River islands projects, is when monitoring data shows a clear increase in native species. They are powerful examples of how the right ecological interventions can lead to
Landscape Architecture Rooted in Place, People, and Process
livingLAB is a Detroit-based landscape architecture and ecological planning firm that focuses on sustainable design rooted in place, people, and process. Through a blend of environmental expertise and community engagement, their work spans parks, green infrastructure, community gardens, and other projects with the goal of transforming urban spaces into resilient, inclusive landscapes. SBN Detroit interviewed with livingLAB’s founder, Courtney Piotrowski, to explore the region-specific challenges and opportunities of working in Southeast Michigan, and how a resident-led approach is redefining its approach to landscape architecture. Q: What was the impetus behind livingLAB, and how did the concept take shape? A: livingLAB was born from a desire to offer a more people-centered approach to landscape architecture than what we had experienced in larger, traditional firms. We believe great spaces require the collaboration of many people to build and steward them. By centering community voices and respecting the diverse neighborhoods and environments we work in, we’re able to create more impactful, meaningful spaces. Our work is rooted in community-driven values. Q: How is the field of landscape architecture evolving in response to climate change and environmental pressures? A: Sustainability has always been a foundational aspect of landscape architecture – even when early practices were focused primarily on aesthetics. As climate change has become a more urgent concern, we’ve increasingly focused on resilience and on quantifying the impact of our work. Landscape architects have long planned for dense, walkable communities, green space preservation, and low-impact development. What’s changed is the level of intentionality and the use of technology. We’re now incorporating features like green roofs, water-efficient design, and sustainable materials to reduce environmental harm and promote long-term climate resilience. In many ways, environmental thinking is inherent in our work – it’s just more explicit now. Q: What are the most pressing ecological or environmental challenges unique to Southeast Michigan that you encounter in your work? A: Much of our work is within the city of Detroit, where we frequently encounter challenges like industrial air pollution and localized flooding – especially due to more frequent and severe storms linked to climate change. Industrial activity and truck traffic create not just poor air quality, but excessive noise, and safety concerns. These are not abstract environmental issues – they directly impact residents’ health and quality of life. So, for us, it’s very much about community-centered environmental solutions. Q: Conversely, what opportunities does Southeast Michigan’s geography and ecosystem present that may not exist in other parts of the country? A: Southeast Michigan has the tremendous privilege – and responsibility – of being home to the Great Lakes, which contain 20% of the world’s fresh surface water. This region plays a critical role in protecting drinking water, ensuring recreational access, and restoring ecosystems like streams, wetlands, and forests. Our geography is a unique asset, and thoughtful environmental planning here can have an outsized impact. Q: You describe your work as resident-led. What does that look like in practice? How does that shift the process or outcomes of a project? A: Every project we take on has a community engagement component. But for us, it’s more than checking a box – we aim for true co-creation. That means understanding the goals, concerns, and lived experiences of the people who will use and be affected by the space. It shifts the outcome significantly. Projects are more likely to be used, embraced, and maintained when they reflect community priorities. For example, in our master planning work at Patton Park in Southwest Detroit, we held deep engagement sessions across many demographics and age groups. One topic that emerged was the role of public safety – what presence felt welcoming versus intrusive. Those conversations shaped design decisions and ultimately helped the community feel more connected to the changes. Q: What systemic or policy barriers make sustainable landscape design more difficult to implement at scale in this region? A: One of the biggest challenges is the fragmentation across regulatory bodies and municipal agencies. For example, the City of Detroit’s Planning Department may have goals that conflict with those of the Water and Sewerage Department. That lack of alignment creates roadblocks during implementation. Additionally, we often lack dedicated funding for green infrastructure, as well as the capacity to maintain it long-term. These barriers can stall otherwise promising projects. Q: How are equity and access being addressed—or not addressed—in landscape architecture and green infrastructure planning today? A: Equity often comes into focus around issues like green stormwater infrastructure. Historically, urban communities have borne the brunt of climate-related issues like flooding or heat islands. Over the past 13 years, we’ve seen significant strides in bringing equity into the conversation. But that progress is fragile. Much depends on political will and continued investment. We also must rebuild trust with communities that have historically been left out of these processes. The current political climate, with its emphasis on dismantling equity-focused initiatives, presents a real challenge. Q: If you could implement one major change in how we design and manage land in Southeast Michigan, what would it be – and why? A: We need to rethink how we address housing and transportation because those two areas are deeply connected to land use, sustainability, and community health. Expanding access to affordable, climate-resilient housing that is connected to transit would be a game-changer. Smart land use policy must consider both housing equity and climate adaptation if we want to build healthy, inclusive, and economically resilient communities. That’s the secret sauce. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Rethinking Water in a Changing Climate
Ann Arbor, Michigan-based LimnoTech is an environmental science and engineering firm with more than 50 years of experience with water-related issues. The firm works with public agencies, private industry, and nonprofit organizations to provide science-driven solutions to complex water challenges. SBN Detroit interviewed Brendan Cousino, PE, Principal and Senior Civil & Environmental Engineer at LimnoTech, to discuss the region’s most pressing water infrastructure challenges and where he sees the biggest opportunities for improvement. Q: What is the impetus behind LimnoTech? A: LimnoTech was founded by graduate students at the University of Michigan over 50 years ago. At the time, the country was just beginning to grapple with water pollution and how to treat contaminated waterways. This was also the early age of computing, and the founders began using computer-based modeling to better understand and solve environmental problems. Essentially, they were a crack team of water quality modeling experts who turned their research into a business that provides real-world environmental solutions. Q: With increasing climate variability, how do you approach designing water management solutions that are both adaptable and future-proof? A: To be future-proof, everything must be adaptable. We’re facing longer drought periods and increasingly intense rainfall events – sometimes in very short time frames. These extremes are becoming more common, and we’ve seen the consequences play out across Michigan. Our approach is to stay aligned with the latest climate science, evaluate the full range of projected conditions, and design infrastructure that can perform under both extremes. Q: What are some of the most pressing water-related challenges facing Southeast Michigan today, and how do they compare to other regions? A: Southeast Michigan is dealing with aging infrastructure systems that were built for historical conditions – not today’s climate realities. The recent Great Lakes Water Authority pipe break in Southwest Detroit is one example. Urban flooding and stormwater management are key issues, as is legacy pollution from our industrial past, compounded by new threats like microplastics, and PFAS. At the same time, Michigan is unique in its abundance of freshwater, much of it in relatively clean condition. That puts a responsibility on all of us to protect these globally significant resources. Q: Conversely, what are the biggest opportunities in Southeast Michigan for improvement and is there any low-hanging fruit? A: In many ways, we’ve already picked the low-hanging fruit. For example, our region has been ahead of the curve when it comes to combined sewer overflow treatment. Investments made in the ’90s and early 2000s, such as retention basins and treatment systems, have made a real difference in improving water quality in the region. Many of the pollutant sources in our stormwater are more broadly distributed. What’s next is being more strategic to plan infrastructure investment. We’re using better data and technology to monitor conditions. For example, we can now use robotics to inspect pipes so we don’t have to wait for them to fail, and real-time monitoring to inform operations during wet weather. That allows us to make smarter, targeted investments to prepare for changing conditions. Q: What innovative strategies or technologies are emerging to help cities like Detroit handle extreme weather events and stormwater management? A: Big data and real-time system operations are making a huge difference. With improved forecasting, operators can anticipate where rainfall is headed and adjust pump systems and treatment infrastructure in advance. We’re also using high-resolution 2D modeling to understand where water will accumulate during storms. That allows us to plan better and pinpoint risk areas. It’s transforming how we manage and design urban stormwater systems. Q: You worked extensively on the Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Centennial Park on the Detroit riverfront. What specific water-related challenges did this project address, and how does it serve as a model for future waterfront development? A: The site had a number of infrastructure issues. There was legacy sediment contamination from industrial activity that had to be remediated to support a healthy aquatic ecosystem. The bulkheads along the river also were failing, creating dangerous sinkholes. We replaced those with new shoreline stabilization measures. We also incorporated aquatic habitat restoration into the project. The result is a world-class park that improves the riverfront for people while also addressing serious environmental concerns. It’s a great example of how community projects and infrastructure improvements can work hand in hand. Q: Infrastructure in Detroit is aging and often not designed for today’s environmental pressures. What are the biggest gaps in water infrastructure that need to be addressed, and what solutions exist? A: Much of the infrastructure was designed for storm conditions that were expected to occur once every 10 years. Now we’re seeing those types of storms almost every year, at least in some locations within the region. Our stormwater systems simply weren’t built to handle that level of intensity and frequency. The biggest gap is funding. Many systems are at or beyond their design life, but utilities don’t have the financial resources to replace them quickly. We need to identify failure points, understand what’s most vulnerable, and prioritize investment accordingly. Q: What role do community engagement and education play in developing effective climate resilience projects? A: Community engagement is a core part of most projects we work on. It’s essential that the infrastructure improvements we make actually serve the people who live there. When communities have a voice in the design process, the outcomes are better. Education also is key. Whether it’s installing a rain barrel, planting native species, or simply understanding how the stormwater system works, individual actions can add up. If we can manage even the first half inch of rainfall before it enters the storm system, we reduce the reliance on aging infrastructure. Q: Looking ahead, what do you see as the biggest opportunities for improving climate resilience and sustainable water management in the next decade? A: One major opportunity is the shift we’re seeing from purely regulatory compliance to voluntary corporate action. Many of our corporate clients are taking the initiative to reduce their water impacts. That’s a
