Scrap Soils: Innovating with a Robotic Food Waste Collection Pilot Program
Scrap Soils is a Detroit-based nonprofit composting organization, focused on diverting food waste from landfills and transforming it into nutrient-rich compost. Scrap Soils partners with entities like Sanctuary Farms to promote sustainable food waste recovery, helping businesses and residents meet zero-waste goals. Its mission is to divert food waste from landfills, thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions and creating a sustainable local food cycle through composting. In 2023, Scrap Soils piloted a robot program in the Transportation Innovation Zone with support from the city’s Office of Mobility Innovation. The program used an autonomous robot for food waste collection to explore more sustainable and efficient ways of managing and transporting waste. SBN Detroit talked to Scrap Soils co-founder Ricky Blanding about the pilot program, and composting in Detroit. Q: How did you develop the idea for Scrap Soils? What was the driving force behind it? A: I was working at the Whitney and also developing a deep interest in gardening. I began to recognize the immense value of composting in improving soil quality. At the same time, I noticed a significant issue with food waste — there was a clear gap between the waste generated and how it could be utilized productively. So the concept of Scrap Soils emerged from this realization. Composting can serve as a key tool in addressing food waste, turning it into something beneficial for the environment, businesses, and communities alike. Q: In what ways does composting help businesses and the community meet their zero-waste goals? A: Composting gives businesses a sustainable alternative for managing their food waste. Many companies are simply throwing food away because they may not have other options available to them, and what we aim to do is close that food loop. By offering businesses an opportunity to compost, we ensure that the resources they are using — and paying to dispose of — are put back into a healthier and more sustainable food system. This creates a more robust solution for food waste recovery and helps businesses and residents alike see the value in contributing to a circular economy. Q: What are some of the partnerships you’ve established with local businesses and other organizations? A: Our primary farm partner is Sanctuary Farms, and through that relationship, we’re looking at expanding partnerships with multiple farms to broaden our reach. We’re particularly focused on districts 4, 5, and 6 in Detroit. We’re also working closely with the West Village Business Association—West Village is where our home base is, and we want to be impactful in that community. Beyond that, we’ve partnered with The Schvitz, AAA, and Renaissance High School. Each of these partnerships helps us connect with different parts of the community to extend our mission of food waste recovery. We are still very new and see growth on the horizon. Q: How do you think getting businesses on board to compost contributes to Detroit’s broader sustainability efforts, particularly in terms of reducing the city’s waste footprint? A: First, composting will reduce the amount of food waste going to landfills by closing the food loop through composting. But beyond the practical aspects, there’s a larger goal of shifting the overall mindset within the community and the city. Our mission isn’t just about waste — it’s about inspiring people to care more about their environmental impact. When you get businesses and individuals thinking about closing the food loop and diverting food waste, they typically start to think about other ways in which they can address sustainability. Q: What educational initiatives are you implementing to inform the community about composting and sustainability? A: Education is key. This summer, we collaborated with Renaissance High School to run a summer cohort program, where a group of students helped us fundraise for Scraps Soils. They learned essential skills like grant writing, networking, and fundraising, as well as the broader importance of composting. It’s not just about teaching them how to compost—it’s about giving them ownership over the future of sustainability in Detroit. Q: Do you have data on the amount of food waste diverted from landfills through your composting services? A: During our pilot program, we successfully composted 11,000 pounds of food waste. While we’re still compiling numbers for 2024, we are steadily growing, and over the next 6 to 12 months, we expect to see even more progress. Currently, we have just under 50 members, but the trajectory is promising, and we’re expanding at a consistent pace. Q: How did the idea for using a robot to collect food waste come about, and what were the primary objectives of the pilot program? A: The concept of composting and mobility intersecting is interesting. Managing trucks for food waste collection is expensive and resource-heavy, so we began to wonder if there might be more efficient ways to transport food waste. Detroit is a leader in mobility innovation, so it seemed like the perfect place to test this. The pilot program has allowed us to gather data and see how technology could streamline food waste collection in the future. Q: What were the environmental benefits of replacing traditional waste collection methods with a robot in terms of reducing emissions? A: A clear benefit is the reduction in emissions by eliminating the need for traditional trucks and the people and resources required to operate them. The robot helped us centralize the movement of food waste, removing the middleman and making the process more autonomous. We’re still analyzing the full impact of the pilot program, but it’s clear that mobility innovations like this can play a role in creating a more sustainable system. Q: How do you see technology shaping the future of waste management and composting in Southeast Michigan? A: We’re constantly learning about the evolving nature of mobility and how it connects to waste management. Looking ahead, I envision diversifying the types of vehicles we use and where the food waste ultimately goes. The city has been very engaged in observing the impact of our program, and we’ve gained valuable insights into
The Growing Role of Refill Shops
The concept of refilling containers to reduce plastic waste and promote sustainability is taking hold in many forms. From pop-ups to brick-and-mortar, Refill Shops, known as refilleries, are becoming more prevalent. To find out more about the industry, SBN Detroit interviewed three local business owners: Corey Thompson, founder of Red Oak Refillery with installations in two locations; Jessica Cichowlas, owner of BYOC with brick-and-mortar locations in Ann Arbor and Plymouth, and Ashby Cummings, owner of MI-Fillosophy in Plymouth. Q: Why a refillery? Thompson: The inspiration for Red Oak Refillery came from my time working at Mama Suds, a brand focused on natural household cleaners. By 2021, we were seeing that roughly 30% of Mama Suds’ wholesale sales were directed to refilleries, predominantly on the East and West coasts. This made it clear that there was a need for refill services in other areas as well. I started my business as a pop-up in Oxford in 2021, working part-time with my product set up at a coffee shop in Lake Orion. Setting up my products for a few hours each day gave me the opportunity to fine-tune my model. Instead of going the traditional brick-and-mortar route, I opted for a distributed model with installations in businesses that align with my values. I currently operate in two locations and am preparing to open a third, all while continuing my role at Mama Suds. Cichowlas: I was a customer at BYOC, and the mission of reducing single-use plastic resonated deeply with me. The owner announced she was selling and I took over the two locations – Plymouth and Ann Arbor. My goal remains to uphold that mission, with a focus on sourcing from local family-run businesses that reflect our core values of sustainability and environmental responsibility. Cummings: Mi-Fillosophy launched in February 2023 with a focus on food rather than lifestyle products, which sets us apart from most refill shops. I noticed a significant gap in the market, particularly after many bulk food stores shut down during the pandemic, and I wanted to address that gap by offering consumers a more sustainable way to shop for food. Q: How has the community responded to the concepts of container reuse and the reduction of single-use plastics? Thompson: The community response has been positive. For some, the idea of a refillery is novel and intriguing, though it’s a concept that has been common in places like India for centuries. Others have embraced the concept and seek out refill shops that align with their sustainability goals. Beyond that, the community also has actively sought me out for collaboration. For instance, Orion Oaks Elementary reached out for assistance in achieving certification through the Green Schools Program, and I got invited to speak at various summits and conferences. I think refilleries naturally become hubs for education and sustainable practices within their communities. Cichowlas: The Ann Arbor community has embraced the refill shop a bit faster, I think, because the city has committed to sustainability goals – aiming for carbon neutrality by 2030. So, our store’s mission really resonates there. We’ve seen growing support in Plymouth as well, as more people begin adopting zero-waste practices. Cummings: Customers have responded positively to a refill shop focused on food. Many like the option of purchasing smaller amounts or just what they need, which helps them avoid unnecessary waste. Q: How has your clientele evolved over time? Thompson: Our customer base continues to consist of both repeat visitors and newcomers. Some people actively seek out refill shops as part of their efforts to live more sustainably, while others are discovering the concept for the first time. It’s rewarding to see that growth and interest. Cichowlas: We’ve developed a strong core of repeat customers, most of whom are local. However, we also see people traveling from further distances to stock up on refills, which is a testament I think to more people adopting sustainability practices. Cummings: I’ve drawn customers from all around metro Detroit, but more and more refill shops are opening so people don’t have to drive as far to reach them, which helps from an emissions reduction standpoint and therefore is great. Many people from the local community here have become regulars. Q: What challenges have you faced in operating a refill shop? Thompson: One of the biggest challenges is that this industry is still relatively new, so we’re dealing with the typical obstacles any startup faces. Beyond that, educating the public about the refill concept is a continuous effort. Cichowlas: Our main challenge is keeping our costs competitive with larger chains while maintaining our commitment to sustainability and local sourcing. Cummings: For me, since my focus is food, managing food safety is a challenge. Keeping track of expiration dates and managing recalls. There’s also a need for constant education, particularly around bulk food safety, which some customers are unfamiliar with. Q: What role do refill shops play in educating the community on sustainability? Thompson: Refill shops play a critical role in community education, whether we intended it or not. Customers come to us with questions, and we find ourselves being the ones to provide answers. It’s an organic process — people look to us for guidance. I also think the local refill shops act as an example and a reminder to think more sustainably. Cichowlas: I believe refill shops have an obligation to educate the community. From understanding which ingredients are safe to selecting products that align with sustainable values, we can remove a lot of the guesswork for people and it’s a service that’s important. Zero-waste can seem intimidating, so part of our mission is to make it accessible and achievable for everyone. Cummings: The presence of a refill shop brings sustainability to the forefront of community awareness. Every day, whether it’s answering questions about recycling or helping customers choose eco-friendly products, we’re educating our customers. Q: How do refill shops help reduce the carbon footprint? Thompson: The impact is significant, even with small changes. Just using a container
USGBC: Strategies, Challenges in Designing Environmentally Responsible Buildings
The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering prosperous, healthy, and resilient communities through sustainable practices. With a focus on shaping the built environment, USGBC believes that buildings and communities can be designed, constructed, and operated in ways that benefit both people and the planet. To this end, USGBC launched the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification program in 2000, which is now one of the most widely recognized and used green building rating systems in the world, promoting sustainable building practices and helping to reduce the environmental impact of buildings and communities. SBD Detroit interviewed Lana Crouse, Regional Director U.S. Market Transformation & Development for USGBC, and joining us was Laura Long, who – as a Senior Designer at NORR, a global architecture and engineering firm – offers insights from a design perspective as it relates to Southeast Michigan. Q: What role do buildings play in greenhouse gas emissions? Long: 42% of annual CO2 emissions come from the built environment. 27% of this is from operational carbon, which is the carbon created from operating and maintaining the life of the building. The remaining 15% of CO2 emissions come from embodied carbon, the greenhouse gas emissions emitted from the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, construction, and disposal of building and infrastructure materials. Crouse: Since buildings account for this significant portion of greenhouse gases and resource depletion, it’s crucial that we design them to minimize resource use such as water and electricity and focus on site selection so that ultimately buildings are healthier for those who inhabit them. By doing so, they do less harm to the environment. When designing and building structures, we can create spaces that also address critical issues like embodied carbon and operational carbon – the issues Laura outlined. Q: What are the biggest trends in green building currently? Long: One major trend is the requirement to track greenhouse gas emissions, which became a prerequisite in LEED 4.0 in March. This means that buildings cannot achieve LEED certification without accounting for these emissions. Another emerging trend is creating a full building lifecycle assessment (LCA) early in the design process. This assessment allows architects to evaluate the environmental impacts of products across their entire lifecycle. LCAs are pushing designers to focus on selecting materials that can reduce both embodied carbon and operational carbon, while also promoting a “cradle-to-cradle” approach to eliminate waste and help encourage manufacturers to develop systems to reclaim products at the end of their lifecycle and reuse them. Crouse: This approach – and LEED Certification – applies to all building types, including homes, communities, and districts. In Southeast Michigan, Royal Oak and Oakland County just certified under the LEED for Cities program, which shows that it’s not just about individual buildings — it’s about creating more sustainable communities where all factors, including utilities and quality of life, are taken into account. Q: How does Michigan’s approach to green building compare to the rest of the country? Crouse: Michigan ranks 20th in the total number of LEED projects among all U.S. states and territories. Progress made in green building across the U.S. is driven by both policies or mandates at the state or local level as well as by the market. While we are seeing market-driven growth in the state, Michigan lacks some of these comprehensive mandates. However, we are seeing some local governments take action. Cities like Ann Arbor and Detroit have started to establish benchmarking ordinances, but we still have opportunities to grow and implement more sustainable building codes. Q: What are the challenges for green building in Southeast Michigan? Long: One challenge is having enough builders and contractors who understand green building practices. Another is that municipalities and local governments need to drive the shift toward more sustainable building codes. While we have champions in the private sector, like Bedrock and the Erb Family Foundation, sustainability often needs to be dictated by governing bodies for widespread adoption. Crouse: A major challenge for design teams is budget constraints. Many owners believe high-efficiency operating systems cost more, and while upfront costs may or may not be higher, they lead to significant savings and environmental benefits over time. Sustainable buildings also improve employee retention and productivity by prioritizing health and well-being through elements like biophilic design and thermal comfort. Q: What are the opportunities for green building in Southeast Michigan? Crouse: Education is key — especially when it comes to helping people understand how sustainable buildings contribute to the health and well-being of those who live and work in them. Cities like Detroit and Ann Arbor are driving these efforts, but we need to reach surrounding areas to continue the push for green building. Q: Are there any standout green building projects in Southeast Michigan? Crouse: Huntington Place in Detroit achieved LEED Gold certification, the first structure of its size in Michigan to do so. It was the first convention center certified through LEED v4.1 in the world. The WPP space (Marquette Building, 243 West Congress, Detroit) is another example, recently renovated and now owned by Bedrock. Q: How do Michigan’s climate and geography affect green building strategies? Long: Michigan’s cool, humid climate and proximity to the Great Lakes present unique challenges. One of the biggest issues we face is managing stormwater to prevent pollution in the Great Lakes. Separating sewer and stormwater systems is crucial to reducing runoff into our water sources. Using LEED and low-impact development strategies, we can manage stormwater more effectively within individual project sites. Crouse: LEED is constantly evolving to meet these challenges. In 2025, we’ll roll out LEED version 5, which will place an even greater emphasis on climate resilience, stormwater management, and designing buildings to withstand extreme weather events. Q: What do you think USGBC’s role will be in the future of green building? Crouse: USGBC will continue to provide guidance to help development teams achieve sustainability and high-performing building goals. Our role is to understand the market and continually push things
Phinia’s Twin Focus: Efficiency Today and a Carbon-Free Future
Based in Auburn Hills, Mich., Phinia (NYSE: PHIN) is a publicly traded company spun off from BorgWarner in July 2023 that is dedicated to advancing sustainable mobility solutions. It specializes in fuel systems, electrical systems, alternative fuel technologies, and aftermarket products, Phinia aims to enhance fuel efficiency, reduce emissions, and help drive the transition to cleaner, low-carbon fuels. SBN Detroit interviewed Todd Anderson, Phinia’s Chief Technology Officer, to explore the implementation of alternative fuel systems and their real-world applications. Q: Phinia has allocated 78% of its research and development to fuel efficiency and alternative fuel technologies and 30% of that to zero- and low-carbon fuel systems. Can you tell us more about this initiative? A: We are committed to driving efficiencies today while moving toward a carbon-neutral and ultimately carbon-free future. It’s important not to focus solely on future technologies when there is a clear need to improve our current energy systems. By allocating 78% of our budget to fuel efficiency and alternative fuel technologies, we are addressing both immediate and long-term needs. This investment allows us to work on improving the systems that our customers currently use and are ordering while also investing in alternative fuels that will help us achieve decarbonization over time. Our funding applies to all aspects of our business. The research and development aspect, mentioned above, but also investing in other business functions, including manufacturing, supply chain, and quality to ensure that as a business we are ready to move forward into a new era. Q: Describe the different alternative fuel systems and what they are used to power today. A: Each of these fuel systems serves specific purposes and applications, providing a range of options for different vehicle types and needs. Advanced Gasoline Direct Injection (GDi) Systems are primarily used to power lighter vehicles, from passenger cars to medium-duty vehicles. Recently, we released a 500-bar GDi system with this higher pressure, designed to improve fuel economy and reduce emissions for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. Hydrogen fuel cell technology powers electric vehicles (EVs) using an onboard fuel cell that uses hydrogen as fuel. This system is suitable for a range of vehicles, from lighter passenger cars to medium-duty vehicles, and could be particularly efficient for delivery vehicles in controlled environmental settings. Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) technology is well-suited for heavier applications where high loads, continuous operation, and challenging environments are common, such as heavy commercial vehicles and medium commercial vehicles. Hydrogen ICE provides the power and performance expected from traditional diesel or gasoline systems but without harmful emissions to the environment. Q: How is developing technologies for alternative fuels different from working on traditional combustion engines? A: Interestingly, it’s quite similar in many ways. The ways in which we develop liquid fuel systems for gasoline or diesel engines are directly applicable as we move toward alternative fuels. The basic physical principles, such as combustion and fluid metering, remain the same. The difference lies in adapting and refining the elements of these systems to work with alternative fuels. For example, in a hydrogen internal combustion engine, hydrogen gas is injected into the combustion chamber instead of gasoline. While the core technology remains similar, we need materials that can seal and respond appropriately to hydrogen gas, along with some design refinements. Q: What are the main challenges in creating and adopting alternative fuel technologies? A: The technology to use alternative fuels in vehicles is already well understood and has been proven effective. However, the challenge lies in the ecosystem needed to support these fuels. Take hydrogen internal combustion engines (ICE) as an example. While we have vehicles running effectively with this technology, faster market adoption requires sustainable hydrogen production at a scale that isn’t currently available. The infrastructure to deliver this sustainable alternative fuel to the point of use also needs to be in place. Currently, the cost of hydrogen is higher than will be acceptable for a broad market adoption. In my discussions with government officials in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, my call to action has been clear: ensure sufficient production of renewable hydrogen while developing the infrastructure needed to deliver it. This will help reduce costs and support wider adoption. Q: What do you see as the biggest opportunities for growth and innovation in alternative fuels? A: We see significant growth opportunities in the transportation sector, whether in passenger cars or commercial vehicles. In the shorter term, there is substantial interest in commercial vehicles due to their specific operating conditions. For example, there is great potential with captive fleets operating on fixed routes, where we can achieve significant progress without needing to rely on widespread public infrastructure for hydrogen deployment. This allows us to make meaningful advancements in those areas. Additionally, there is interest in alternative fuels beyond just transportation. We’re seeing opportunities in industrial applications, marine sectors, and stationary power generation. Industries like marine shipping, especially large vessels, are actively exploring alternative fuels. So, while there are significant opportunities in transportation, they extend far beyond that sector. Q: How does Phinia work with partners in the alternative fuel industry? Can you share any recent partnerships? A: Partnerships are critical for us — no company can operate as an island. We partner with government bodies such as the U.S. Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the European Commission, and the UK Transport Authority. We also work closely with our customers to support their vehicle roadmaps and align our innovations to meet their needs. We have close partnerships with universities and educational institutions, which provide access to their innovative and advanced thinking while supporting communities and students alike. In addition, collaboration with our supply chain partners is vital. Q: How does Phinia ensure sustainability is integrated into product design and development, particularly with your “Design for Environment” approach? A: Sustainability is critical in the design process. Our design reviews include considerations like the potential for remanufacturing and the end-of-life designation for products, which are vital elements of a circular
ITC Holdings and Its Role in a Greener Grid
Founded in 2003 and headquartered in Novi, Mich., ITC Holdings builds, operates, and maintains high-voltage electric transmission systems that carry electricity in Michigan and around the Midwest. The company owns and operates approximately 16,000 circuit miles of transmission lines across 90,000 square miles of service territory. SBN Detroit interviewed Simon Whitelocke, senior vice president and chief business officer to find out more. Q: How does ITC approach sustainability? A: We are central to a broader sustainability initiative aimed at decarbonizing the electrical grid, facilitating the shift by interconnecting greener electricity, even though we don’t generate it ourselves. When building transmission infrastructure, we are highly mindful of our environmental impact. Our transmission lines, which have a lifespan of sixty to seventy years, traverse both urban and rural areas. We strive to be good neighbors to the environment, habitats, and wildlife around them. Before starting a transmission project, we conduct an environmental assessment to determine the best route, the type of land it will occupy, and potential impacts on sensitive habitats or endangered species. We also carefully plan the construction timing to minimize its environmental impact. Q: How has ITC evolved over time when it comes to sustainability? A: From day one, ITC has prioritized being mindful of our impact, making environmental responsibility a core part of our company culture. As we’ve expanded into diverse geographies and worked in various environments, our commitment has deepened. Our repertoire and tools have grown and adapted over time, leading to enhanced and improved expertise. Q: How has the infrastructure evolved, and what are the solutions for building toward sustainability? A: We operate with significant oversight, often collaborating with federal, state, and local governments, which provide a framework of standards. Cities and states have developed sustainability plans that we work within. For example, Michigan has the MI Healthy Climate Plan, and we align our efforts with it. The public is also more aware and engaged, and there is much greater support for sustainability initiatives today. Q: How does your work vary from state to state when it comes to dealing with habitat and environment? A: Every state presents unique challenges and regulates environmental matters differently, so it’s certainly not a one-size-fits-all approach. At the federal level, there are baseline protections for certain species that apply nationwide, but some states have additional protections for species-specific to their region. For instance, Michigan is unique due to its extensive wetlands. Compared to Iowa, which has fewer trees and less water, Michigan presents a totally different set of environmental factors. These variations create a lot of state-to-state differences in our work. We collaborate with local and federal governments on mitigation plans to ensure our impact on the environment is as minimal as possible. What are the biggest challenges that you encounter in managing habitat around building and maintaining infrastructure, and what are the lessons you have learned along the way? A: ITC takes great care to protect the environment and habitats surrounding our infrastructure, but the most challenging item we have encountered is invasive species. To counter this, we employ adaptive management techniques, meaning, that once we plant something, we don’t just walk away from it. We consult with biologists to regularly monitor those areas to control, and remediate, any invasive issues that may arise. Q: How do you handle materials and recycling? A: We partner with Goodwill Greenworks, among other recyclers, to recycle our construction material. As we replace infrastructure the old materials such as wires, cables, and metal copper steel go to them, versus a landfill. Goodwill Greenworks also creates job opportunities and supports community development by training individuals in green jobs and environmental management. When we decommission old equipment, such as batteries at substations, we ensure that these materials are properly recycled. This includes recycling oil, metals, and other components with the help of our experts. We send concrete structures used as foundations for equipment to recyclers that crush and reuse it as aggregate, or to produce new concrete. Similarly, untreated wood, such as old pallets or shipping crates is recycled into mulch or used as fuel for co-generation. Also, old wooden poles are often donated to landowners versus having to be disposed of in a landfill. Overall, we are increasingly focused on recycling and being mindful of our environmental impact. Q: How does ITC incorporate sustainability into its operations beyond infrastructure and recycling? A: In 2022 we received a Gold Tier Program Award for our efforts at our Novi headquarters and we’ve been awarded several Conservation Certifications from the Wildlife Habitat Council. I think this demonstrates our commitment to environmental stewardship. The property the campus sits on includes significant wetland areas, and we are highly sensitive to maintaining and protecting these natural spaces. This approach extends to our transmission corridors and warehouses, where we prioritize living in harmony with the environment. The 2003 blackout was ultimately triggered by a power line coming in contact with a tree, so we are particularly mindful of managing vegetation under our power lines. When we remove trees, we have replaced them with habitats such as prairies that support local species and pollinators. This reflects our focus on sustainable land management practices. Additionally, many of our transmission corridors are integrated with walking and biking trails, allowing people to connect with nature while ensuring the reliable delivery of electricity. We strive to balance the need for power with the importance of preserving green spaces. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Green Door Initiative: Fostering Sustainability and Economic Growth
Founded in 2010 by native Detroiter Donele Wilkins, the Green Door Initiative is a Detroit-based nonprofit dedicated to advancing sustainability and environmental stewardship. It emphasizes developing green spaces, revitalizing urban areas, empowering communities, and workforce development tailored to the green energy sector. In March, Wilkins was appointed to serve on the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council established by President Biden under Executive Order 14008 of January 27, 2021, to tackle the climate crisis here and around the world. SBN Detroit interviewed Wilkins about the vision and the progression of the Green Door Initiative and how serving on the advisory council will impact its trajectory. Q: What is the impetus behind the Green Door Initiative? A: The Green Door Initiative is an environmental justice nonprofit organization based in Detroit. Our mission is to ensure that everyone, regardless of race or ZIP code, is environmentally literate and capable of promoting and living a sustainable lifestyle. We achieve this through several programs and initiatives. First, we offer community education and access to resources – opportunities for residents and community members to learn about environmental protection and improve their daily lives. Through workshops and awareness programs, we translate complex information into actionable steps, helping individuals access resources to enhance their environmental conditions. Another big focus of ours is workforce development. Here, we focus on increasing the capacity of residents to compete in the environmental and green sectors. Our 12-week training program has a 92% job placement rate, offering underrepresented and underserved individuals opportunities to become certified and licensed for well-paying, family-supporting jobs. This program covers various environmental and green-collar jobs, addressing climate change, pollution removal, and more. We also engage youth in this program. Every summer, we employ high school students to support their transition into leadership roles and career planning. And finally, we work to impact public policy related to environmental health, advocating for equal protection to mitigate issues such as poor air quality, and unsafe drinking water. We advocate for investments and resources that mitigate climate impacts, ensuring that our communities are heard in decision-making processes and receive the necessary support. Q: What types of jobs does your workforce development program help people secure? A: We train individuals for diverse careers in the environmental and green sectors. We specialize in placing certified professionals in roles related to environmental cleanup, including handling hazardous materials and addressing pollution. We also support job placement in energy audits and solar installation, helping individuals improve energy efficiency and contribute to renewable energy projects. Additionally, we facilitate apprenticeships, particularly in electrical fields linked to green energy. Our network extends to disaster response roles, where individuals assist with emergency food and water distribution, and to various general green sector positions. We continuously seek out potential career opportunities in the environmental field. Q: What other initiatives are you pursuing in workforce development? A: We’re actively involved in several projects related to workforce development. One major initiative is our Air Quality Management Project, which we started with funding from the EPA. This involves installing air monitoring systems and collecting real-time data to share with the community. We are also focused on community outreach, training residents on the significance and use of this data. Additionally, we’ve created job opportunities through our training programs. Several participants have been hired for internships and full-time positions as air monitor installers. We’ve also partnered with Just Air, a for-profit company, to fulfill a contract with Wayne County for installing 100 air monitors. This collaboration allowed us to employ our trainees and demonstrate our capability to meet local needs. Q: What is the economic impact of green jobs? A: It’s huge. These roles are among the fastest-growing job trends that exist today, and they significantly benefit local economies. Green jobs contribute to environmental restoration and adaptation, aiding communities in recovering from storms and other environmental challenges. As the shift toward electric vehicles and related infrastructure accelerates, more job opportunities arise, creating synergy with the auto industry. Our 12-week program trains several cohorts of 25-30 individuals quarterly, offering comprehensive education in environmental and green-collar sectors. This training spans various fields, including solar installation, and prepares participants for diverse opportunities, benefiting both large and small contractors. To date, we’ve graduated 1,700 individuals from our program. Q: Does Green Door focus on manufacturing jobs, given the industry’s significance in Detroit? A: Yes, we do engage with manufacturing jobs, including those related to solar panel assembly. For example, we’ve partnered with companies involved in solar panel manufacturing and installation. We’ve also established a company – 313 Solar – that is not yet launched, which will aim to handle the full spectrum of solar panel operations, from manufacturing to maintenance. We’re actively collaborating with companies planning to set up in Wayne County and working with the Department of Economic Development and other partners. These companies often seek grants and will recruit from our trained workforce, ensuring alignment with industry needs and sustainability goals. Q: Can you expand on the community education you offer and its impact on Southeast Michigan? A: We’ve provided approximately 25,000 hours of community awareness training. Our focus includes educating people on navigating permit hearings and understanding environmental protection at local, state, and federal levels. We cover environmental health impacts, such as the effects of poor air quality on health. We also address misconceptions, such as victims being blamed for their health issues due to lifestyle choices like poor diet or smoking. We engage in discussions about food deserts and other systemic issues, aiming to shift the trajectory by proactively influencing development and policy changes. Q: What impact do you have on local businesses? A: We help local businesses access talent they might not have considered. Many companies struggle to fill positions or find the right skill set, and we provide solutions by presenting qualified candidates. Businesses are often surprised by the high quality of the individuals we connect them with. We encourage businesses to reach out and have a conversation with us. Our team of job developers
Becoming Sustainable in a Water-Intensive Business
In 2013, industrial designer Shayla Johnson launched Scarlet Crane Creations and began selling her stationery and other prints at The Rust Belt Market in Ferndale. She quickly realized her disdain for using paper as a medium due to the waste it created. Pivoting to natural and organic fabrics and eco-friendly inks, she created her Detroit Collection which includes home décor and accessories made from original and sustainable hand-printed fabrics. Over the next eleven years, she progressed her sustainability practices and is now revamping her systems, equipment, and space toward the preservation of water and the support of using organic dyes and materials. SBN Detroit interviewed Johnson about the impetus behind her vision, the challenges in executing sustainable practices in the print and textile industry, and the solutions she is employing. Q: What is the company’s approach to sustainability? A: Sustainability is always a thread in my thinking and I’m always looking for ways to do better. I’ve progressed from paper to fabric to more responsible fabric and continue this evolution. I use all organic and eco-friendly inks. We are also focused on a closed-loop system that allows us to recycle the water we use. Q: What inspired you to focus on your water usage, and what are the challenges in the printing/textile industry that you face regarding this? A: At one point along the way I measured how much water I was using in one print session, and it was ten gallons. To put this in perspective, that involved dying about ten to 15 yards of fabric. I saw this as completely problematic, watching all that water go down the drain. And began to think exponentially – what does this look like across the country and globe? I have come to find out that the global textile industry utilizes 1.3 trillion gallons of water annually – enough to fill 2 million Olympic-sized pools. Q: What did you do next? A: Water-based inks have always been my focus. I knew that going forward when I dump the waste, I needed to make sure it was filtered and disposed of properly and the water was reused. I began working with Centrepolis, and they connected me to Dr. Refael Aharon, an expert in textile recycling. We worked for four months studying my processes and developed a system that he outlined for me including recommendations and the equipment and type of space I will need. Q: You recently won a $10K grant from Michigan Women Forward to expand your space to accommodate this. What has this involved? A: That’s right. I am part of the Motor City Match program now and am in the development track, where I’m getting help to further plan the space and secure a location. Q: You utilize fabrics that are sourced in the U.S. and the production is focused locally in Detroit. What challenges come with this? A: The companies we order from are all American-based companies, and it is all organic cotton and linens, etc. But there are very few mills in the U.S. these days, so some of the raw goods are unfortunately imported. The companies we buy from all have a commitment to sustainability, and I try to purchase as much fabric as I can locally. Our bread-and-butter product – tea towels – is from a fabric company in Michigan. Q: What are the challenges in working with organic inks and dyes? A: Using natural dyes requires a different process that is more labor-intensive and therefore takes longer. These dyes are made from plants and proteins that come from cactuses and other natural sources and can be more expensive to source. Since they are all-natural, they don’t last as long. We have to use them faster and that can be tricky to manage. So, the biggest barrier becomes being able to produce in a way that still allows us to sell the products at a reasonable price. However, my clients appreciate and seek out these products purposefully, choosing not to purchase ink that requires solvents and materials made of synthetics, etc. So, they are not surprised by higher price points. This model aligns with slow fashion – being thoughtful and intentional about the outcome even if that takes longer. I believe in having an item that will last longer and that won’t end up in a landfill. Q: Are there additional sustainability practices you deploy? A: Some of our items are created from upcycled materials like jeans and pre-owned items. People also like these because they are one-of-a-kind. Q: In terms of sustainability – does your location in Detroit come into play? A: Yes. Because there has been a resurgence of interest around Detroit and people are looking to focus efforts in this area, that has helped. People want to support us. My assistant is a College for Creative Studies graduate, and I want to continue to train students locally who have a passion for fibers and sustainability around textiles. I want to keep all of that within the Detroit ecosystem. Q: What are the barriers you have faced operating sustainably as a smaller company? A: The inability to work as quickly as we’d like. Also, the dyes I mentioned. Some only last two to three weeks, so we try to print as much as we can in a few sessions before the vat goes bad. Organic materials can be unstable. You constantly must keep them fresh. Q: What is your advice to other design/textile companies like yours when it comes to sourcing locally to help the economy and be more sustainable? A: I believe in collaboration, especially with local schools and universities. I think sticking to a local pipeline of talent is important. I work as an adjunct at CCS, and it’s really been useful to me to bounce ideas off of others. My advice is to never work in a silo – build a community. To that end, I belong to a couple of community printmakers in the area and have been deeply
EV Infrastructure Has Funding – When Will There Be Stations?
Three years ago, under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Congress allocated $5 billion in federal funding to establish the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Program. This initiative aims to develop charger networks across each state to support electric vehicles (EVs). Of this funding, $110 million was earmarked for Michigan, covering the period through fiscal year 2026. However, the state has not yet seen the installation of any new power stations. As part of this effort, Red E Charging LLC – an EV infrastructure developer and charging network based in Detroit – has been awarded several NEVI contracts to install and manage in Michigan and a number of other states. SBN Detroit interviewed Red E Charging Founder Abass El-Hage about the timeline, barriers, and factors specific to Michigan regarding power station installation. Q: Since the announcement in 2021 of the $5 billion in federal funding just 11 EV stations have been installed across seven states, with none in Michigan to date. From your perspective, why is this? A: There are several reasons. First, this is a new process and it took time to get organized, generate RFPs, and kick it off. RFPs were published at the end of last year and contracts were awarded early this year. Setting up the necessary paperwork is tedious and time-consuming, and around public funds, there is just a lot of due diligence required. There are also multiple and varied requirements around bonding that can take another six months to sort out. Identifying appropriate locations for the charging stations with the right amenities on the property that’s willing to host can be time-consuming. On top of that, regardless of how long the paperwork takes, working with the utilities and getting the right equipment and resources in place can take six months to a year. It’s simply an arduous process that takes time. Q: Do the requirements vary from state to state? A: Yes. Every state is different when it comes to execution under NEVI. In Texas and New Mexico, the NEVI process is pretty straightforward, but Texas has issues with utilities that can slow things down. I would say Michigan is the middle of the road. And the biggest hurdle here is the strict bonding requirements. Not every state requires bonding, but Michigan requires a five-year bond that’s not run of the mill. Q: Outside of NEVI projects, is every state different? A: Yes. Incentives are different in every state. Utilities are different. In Michigan, we are lucky to have DTE and Consumers Energy. They have been helpful and proactive, and they facilitate a lot. EGLE (Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy) and the EPA have been helpful in Michigan as well, helping to create infrastructure in off-highway locations that are still easily accessible at reasonable rates. Q: In Michigan, are the challenges different in the Upper Peninsula compared with the Lower Peninsula? A: Yes. With every project there are financials, and in the UP there are fewer people, there is less traffic, and therefore less charger usage. It’s harder to justify a project when you don’t make the money back as fast. Additionally, utilities in the Upper Peninsula impose demand charges, which are flat fees added to the electric bill. These charges can be quite substantial. When considering these costs, the financial viability of a project often becomes questionable. Q: How do you view the transition from gas to electric vehicles being understood and received by the public? A: It’s a mixed bag. I think there is still a stigma around charging and how difficult and inconvenient it could be. It’s a misconception in my opinion. I drive from Detroit to Chicago regularly and along that route, I can stop to charge just like stopping for gas. Also, I think there’s been mixed messaging to the public by the auto industry – especially here in Detroit. When there are recalls, or if an automaker commits to building x amount of EVs and then scales back, this sends mixed signals to the public. Q: How many contracts in Michigan has Red E Charging been awarded and what is the status? A: We’ve been awarded 12 NEVI contracts all over the state and an additional 60 fast charger projects across the state for EGLE and utilities. As I explained, the paperwork along with bonding requirements plus environmental approvals, site checks, and more make this a slow process. But we have notice to proceed and are moving forward with the first few now, so these will be underway. The actual installation takes just about two weeks. We were also awarded a project outside of NEVI with the City of Detroit to install public-facing chargers throughout the city. Q: Michigan aims to have enough infrastructure for 2 million EVs on the roads by 2030. Do you think this is possible? A: Yes, I think it can happen. DTE and Consumers Energy are very helpful when it comes to single-family and multifamily homes. It’s cost-effective to have a charger at your home. That drive from Chicago to Detroit I talked about … I think by the end of the year there will be chargers every 20 miles or so, eliminating any planning needed because people will feel confident they can stop whenever they need a charge. I think in the near future the logistics involved in an EV experience will be no different than driving a gas-powered vehicle. It’s just a different thing fueling the car. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Using Data to Create a Greener Bottom Line
Established in 2022 in Detroit by William Crane, OrbAid is dedicated to – in his words – helping companies build greener bottom lines. The company sells AI-based project management software that provides data and recommends actions to help companies prioritize projects that increase profits and environmental impact. SBND interviewed Crane about the current landscape for businesses navigating sustainability projects. Q: What are some of the biggest challenges you see businesses facing when it comes to sustainability? A: There are a number of challenges and some macro trends that stand out. When we look at the largest publicly traded businesses globally, they’ve made public commitments when it comes to their sustainability goals, and have included these in their SEC Filings. Many, if not most, of these companies have a significant gap between their goals and their current progress. The effort required to close this gap is substantial and poses a considerable challenge in itself. Second is the continuous improvement aspect and the time and resources this involves. For example, a company may have a goal to decrease emissions by 10% year over year for the next ten years. Planning for its longevity is a challenge. Automotive suppliers are under significant pressure. One of our customers, Prism Plastics, is particularly challenged by increasingly stringent customer sustainability requirements, and suppliers don’t have a long runway to become compliant. Further, with new government regulations taking effect in the EU and US, companies can face extreme fines and there are rigorous legal ramifications. Both customers and governments are shifting their sustainability expectations from pollution reporting to business greening. Often, companies have sustainability teams composed of employees who are already filling other roles, making it a part-time effort at best. These teams might generate ten ideas for green projects when, realistically, they need 10,000. Also, the sequencing and prioritization of projects is a challenge. Determining the most efficient and effective projects and initiatives to put into place – and in what order – is necessary to be able to sustain continuous improvement. Q: Sequencing of projects – what does this mean exactly and how does that play into a company’s sustainability planning? A: Companies have the best intentions of course, but taking on projects in a strategic order will help to remain profitable. For example, a global manufacturing company might decide to put solar panels on all of their factories across the country or the world. That is not a bad thing, but maybe that project is more expensive and has a longer payback than switching select supplier disposable cardboard boxes to returnable metal racks. Sustainability is a long game, and as I said, most large companies have continuous improvement demands year over year, so it’s about strategically sequencing the projects to remain profitable while meeting goals. Technology can help here. Leaning into AI to sort out the sequencing can be a game changer. Q: Where are companies most often missing opportunities to be more sustainable and increase profits? A: The practical and actionable stuff. There is so much pressure surrounding sustainability. It’s been politicized. There is consumer angst around it. There are stringent government regulations as I mentioned. And people naturally go to extremes. It’s back to the idea of large global manufacturers putting solar panels on all of their factories around the world. This is an enormous and expensive project. Not to say that’s not something they should do at some point, but perhaps first, companies can look at creating less trash, using less water, and converting to different materials in their manufacturing. By doing these things they can save time and money and help the environment. It’s a matter of prioritizing projects and not just throwing a Hail Mary and hoping things work out. There are a number of very practical projects that can be taken on and absorbed that in the end will help businesses be more profitable – and keep them profitable along the way. We’ve been able to help many companies in this way, including GM, Prism Plastics, Berkshire Hathaway, and more. Q: Are these hurdles changing over time? Evolving? A: Yes, when it comes to sustainability things are always evolving. We continue to face changes in regulation. I think 2025 will be an inflection point. If companies don’t comply with regulations the fines will be astronomical. Also, the science and the jargon can be confusing. But consumers are more educated than ever before and also more demanding when it comes to their sustainability expectations of companies. Q: What are some examples of sustainability projects for businesses that you have seen increase profitability? A: Product packaging is a big one. Take appliance companies like Whirlpool. Historically, an appliance gets delivered to a home and you are left with a lot of cardboard and styrofoam. Switching to renewable materials can translate to savings. We are seeing some really creative innovations in packaging materials like fungus-based inserts that are organic and naturally break down. Q: How do you think AI can impact local businesses in terms of sustainability? A: AI is an efficient tool. It can be used to quickly – yet deeply tailor actionable profitable sustainability projects that deliver results. It can be used to calculate the environmental impact and business profit to get better, faster results. Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on sustainable business practices in and around Detroit.
Cascade Engineering – Designing Toward Function, Planet, and People
Created in 1973, Cascade Engineering specializes in large-part plastic injection molding. The second-generation, woman-owned company was recognized at the 2023 Society of Plastics Engineers Automotive Innovation Awards for its work with Ford Motor Co. on the Mega Bin/Frunk for the Ford F-150 Lightning. Frunk is a portmanteau word for a trunk on the front of a vehicle. In doing so, it converted the front trunk from a compression-molded painted sheet-molding compound to a large Class A composite injection-molded part and is currently one of the industry’s largest injection-molded product pieces. SBND interviewed Christina Keller, CEO and chair of the Grand Rapids-based Cascade Engineering Family of Cos., about the frunk’s impact on sustainability, creating circular economy solutions, and evolving trends in the industry. Q: How does sustainability stand out within Cascade Engineering? A: Cascade is a second-generation family business that is woman-owned and sustainable. We are celebrating 50 years as a triple-bottom-line company. We are a certified B Corp, ISO 14001 certified and LEED certified. Our focus is on innovative products and solutions in manufacturing and we supply to the furniture, automotive, and waste industries. Q: What role does sustainability play in the company? A: We have been organized as a triple-bottom-line – people, planet, profit – company since our inception. On the people side, we work heavily with returning citizens and also on initiatives to reduce the state of recidivism in Michigan. On the planet side, we’ve been zero waste to landfill since 2012 and have innovated a number of projects in the circular economy. Obviously, we must be profitable to engage in all these activities. Q: Can you tell us more about the frunk? I believe this is currently the industry’s largest injection molded product piece. What aspects of this impact sustainability? A: First, by eliminating the paint process there is a significant reduction of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). Second, it’s more fuel efficient due to decreased product weight. Next, the manufacturing process has been streamlined to reduce energy. And finally, it’s more recyclable in that the end-of-life material can be recycled into a variety of products. Q: How do you think this impacts Southeast Michigan? A: The paint process takes place in Ford facilities, so eliminating this directly reduces VOCs in Southeast Michigan. The collaboration between Cascade and Ford serves as a promising example of potential collaborations between Tier One suppliers and manufacturers in Southeast Michigan. There are many opportunities for partnerships toward a better environmental outcome. Q: In what other ways does the frunk’s design and manufacturing process impact sustainability? A: We have eliminated the environmental burden of paint in the Frunk’s design. Additionally, the secondary routing of holes has been eliminated, reducing process steps and allowing us to produce a higher quantity of parts in less time. The seal interfaces are integrated into the assembly station for further efficiencies, and the material used is recyclable. Q: The Frunk process utilizes a 4,000-ton injection press and a tool equipped with a 16-drop hot runner system to mold these parts. Is this typical? A: No. The use of a 4,000-ton injection press is unique in the industry. The capital required to purchase this equipment poses a significant barrier for most companies. Additionally, the specialized human capital needed to operate such a large press is rare. Q: Is the new frunk product in production? A: Yes. If you buy a Ford 150 Lightning today you will get one of these pieces in your vehicle. It is fully in production and we are looking at more innovations currently. Q: What new innovations are you working on? A: Additional frunks in the near term. Before electric vehicles, we did not have the space in the front of vehicles to create a front trunk. Now, with increased demand for EVs, it’s a growing area and we are looking at manufacturing a number of additional front trunks. Q: Does being in Michigan in particular post challenges or opportunities in terms of your work on the sustainability front? A: There is an excellent network of manufacturers in Michigan – especially Southeast Michigan – that allows us to be truly innovative. A challenge is finding talent. This sector overall currently has 516,000 job openings and over the next decade is projected to reach 3.8 million. Another challenge we face is incarceration. The U.S. has one of the highest incarceration rates, with 1 in 100 adults in jail. We see returning citizens as a valuable pool of talent that can be trained and integrated into the workforce. This presents a unique opportunity for Michigan, as the state is not attracting enough new residents, and only 50% of college graduates stay here. Additionally, while college graduates remain in their first job for an average of two years, returning citizens tend to stay for seven years. This approach offers an interesting solution to addressing the talent gap in Michigan. Q: How do you see industry trends evolving? A: I see a lot of work in the AI space and Industry 4.0 focused on innovative manufacturing methods. There is a noticeable trend towards reshoring, driven by the constraints observed in the global supply chain during the pandemic. Companies are now striving to establish a local footprint, which also helps reduce the carbon footprint from transportation. Additionally, significant efforts are being made to maximize package density for more efficient shipping and transportation. Regarding talent attraction and retention, we have more 65-year-olds in the U.S. than ever before, while our younger demographic is declining. Q: How is Cascade adapting to the changes in the industry? A: We are constantly scanning the horizon to look at trends. On the sustainability side, we are developing an ecosystem of recycled plastic sources to enhance our clean stream of recyclable materials. We are looking at streams from medical waste that could be used, and post-consumer and post-industrial applications. We are also working on additives to use in our products such as hemp fibers, dust waste, and trash materials. And finally, we are working with
